You do realize A-10A exists, right ?
Tbh ı dont care about A2G potantiel, F16C was more than enough for to do the job.
F15E added too soon in my book.
Given the fact we’ve had soviet mains for the past several days arguing that hte only jet that should have FnF weapons is the Su-34. Meanwhile you have Typhoon players wanting at least 1/10th of the Typhoons IRL A2G abilities to be added.
1 Like
nah, i cant believe people complained so much about a tactical bomber, it was added at perfectly fine time
And they are also wrong in that case, two wrong doesnt make one right, you should understand this by now.
Im not complaining it, i just dont see the point for it.
When F15E added it straight up dominated top tier Air and Ground Rb, was it needed? Absolutely not, is it good in my book? Yes cause i love F15’s and other modern stuffs.
Who explained it and where? I’m not on the forum 24/7 so thanks for letting me know I missed somebody’s explanation somewhere.
In that case same problems will occur on Su34-F15E or any other jet that has F&F munitions.
Oh no, really? You’re deflecting away how these issues aren’t nearly as much of a concern for them (Su-34 specifically) as they are for the Eurofighter. If a Su-34 sticks around after it had already fired off its Kh-38 and waits for SAMs and jets to swarm it, that’s a skill issue.
But sure, lets assume it does get swarmed, what’s the end result of that anyways?
This:
When’s the last time you’ve seen a Eurofighter do this?
I also play all those jets and EFT doesnt struggle in terms of CAS duty.
I didn’t say it struggles, though?
You need admit that you just wanna make EFT to best platform in any mode.
Or maybe I want a vehicle I play to have its real CAS capabilites whilst still striking a middle-ground where it can’t just nuke 18 players out of the game but also won’t require of you to be at least 5 times more skilled than a Su-34 or Rafale or F-16C player.
5 Likes
they had to add it at some point, wouldnt make sense with 2000’s jets in december update
Feel free to do so you may surprise that I don’t complain about stuff torture Russian main because i just simply join them who know? if Raptor come i might get it before you
Smin explained this on Tornado GR4 and other threads multiple times, in that case you’re welcome.
And how can you be so sure when Su-34 spawned there will be no enemy jets or Spaa’s? You’re talking about best case scenarios for SU-34 for while talking about worst cases for EFT.
I know KH38MT’s are really powerful and they can make huge impact on match but in return thats the only redeeming factor about Fullback.
So you’re just basically asking to able to nuke 18 Ground units while not exposing yourself to any threat and carrying 6 A2A munitions at the same time while having best flight performance,best situational awareness and survivability? Because if they added historical Brimstones thats what you will be able to do that.
This is the definition of Game Breaking, if you dont realize this (im sure you do cause i know how smart you are) then i dont know what to say tbh.
Fair enough.
Thats funny.
That says forecast to be met, not met. What makes you think it should handle 30-35 degrees AoA when even a design like the MiG-29 is limited to ~26-28?
well the limits are 25 degrees for landing gear down, and beyond which rudder is damped for stability, so i would expect around 30 degrees for a normal typhoon.
Yeah yeah Russia deserve handheld to the fullest like always other don’t
Is that how balance work out for you?
Did you just use the argument that the Typhoon cant do something because the Mig-29 Cant do it?
You do know that the Typhoon and Mig-29 are 2 very different aircraft that entered service 2 decades apart
5 Likes
Man if they remove KH38MT’s you will loose your only argument to complain about Russians dont you?
1 Like
Then it dies. EFT will also die if there’s already a jet waiting for it, basically any jet will die under these conditions. SPAAs aren’t really a concern for either, especially if the Su-34 needs to only contend with NATO ones in case the match isn’t mixed.
I’m also interested in why you think I’m making up scenarios here when I’m talking about my own experience of using the EFT in GRB and how I’ve been swarmed by both jets and SPAAs (mainly Pantsirs) because of how much time I have to spend and set up my attacks, in comparison to how little time a Su-34 would need to pull off the same, or the Rafale for that matter.
So you’re just basically asking to able to nuke 18 Ground units while not exposing yourself to any threat and carrying 6 A2A munitions at the same time while having best flight performance,best situational awareness and survivability? Because if they added historical Brimstones thats what you will be able to do that.
Oh. My. God.
Or maybe I want a vehicle I play to have its real CAS capabilites whilst still striking a middle-ground where it can’t just nuke 18 players out of the game but also won’t require of you to be at least 5 times more skilled than a Su-34 or Rafale or F-16C player.
My entire point this whole time has been that the amount of Brimstones should be reduced to just six if they’re made F&F!!! I never thought I’d have to say this again.
EFT has significantly higher chances to survive against enemy jets unlike Su-34, we both know that.
I also swarmed by enemy spaas or jets but it never caused a huge issue for me, most of the time i easily demolished enemy jets and focused on Pantsirs after that.
EFT can basically do anything unlike some other jets.
It will not be reduced to 6 and it will not receive ahistorical mode, you need to accept this fact.
It was a sole god damn reason i spend time flying in GRB more than i spend on ground you’re right I finally lost my mind.