Yes it is.
Not understanding all vehicles should have their pros is actually not my problem.
CAS has to be able to handle both ground and air threats.
We all know how “strong” it is against air threats.
Since when is Brimstone an LGBU?
Not my problem your biased mind can’t accept his machines are actually worse at doing something at the same BR.
My guy, this entire argument is based on me saying “If one can’t have F&F then then nobody else should” and you straight up went “No, Russia should but nobody else”.
You are the biased one here, and apparently you can’t even comprehend the things I am saying otherwise we wouldn’t even be having this conversation.
Yes it does as it it’s only advantage while having several major disadvantages.
Confirmed. This guy wants to be able to do this for free:
And he doesn’t want anybody else to have the same level of capability.
Yes ASRAAM is best thought of as a higher pulling R27ET for ingame purposes as R27ET is seeker limited.
IRIS-T is like a SRAAM with more range and again better pull.
Also both would have unflareable seekers.
1 Like
So Su-34 with R-77s and a PESA radar is weak, but a Tornado is strong vs air threats?
From a few picture’s that I’ve seen here before there was one of the Italian EFT having Asraams mounted and Britain having iris-t mounted
Brimstone isn’t IR so there isn’t a problem with it on a western jet.
Yes as they suck at everything else.
What’s the point of an aircraft if it’s subpar at every single metric ?
Says the dude that can’t understand how pro/con system should work.
Meanwhile you want to do the same thing on your UFO platform that can challenge air threats much better.
You aren’t here for balance, it’s pretty clear.
It’s like EFT doesn’t exist.
I don’t know what it’s called but it looks like a pod that only collects data or something, forgive me if I’m wrong
1 Like
Maybe you dont have the EFT unlocked, maybe you’ve died using the Typhoon as CAP and now want to respawn in another aircraft. Etc etc.
There are a 1000 reasons why you may be using the Tornado or Harrier instead of the Typhoon. By your logic, once a new aircraft is added, you just delete all old ones from the game.
Okay, now we’re changing the goalpost.
Yes as they suck at everything else.
What’s the point of an aircraft if it’s subpar at every single metric ?
Irrelevant to the topic, goalposting.
Says the dude that can’t understand how pro/con system should work.
Pro/Con system is when something has some advantages over something else but not to the point it can do something that something else could never. Your idea of “pro/con” (as idiotic as it is), is for Russia to be able to outrange SAMs, ripple fire, and consistently get between 4 to 6 kills with each Su-34 spawn, and then for everybody else to be stuck with things that need constant guidence and HOPE to get more than 2 kills, pfft, get over yourself kid.
You aren’t here for balance, it’s pretty clear.
You have no idea how ironic this sounds. Especially since it took an entire interrogation to get you to say the entire west should’ve never been given ANY IR F&F ordnance.
4 Likes
Why do the brimstones look like that
Me in my Harrier that AGM-65G is too op to be on
Inert display versions.
2 Likes
I don’t think that’s the game’s problem.
How about buffing/changing the brimstones in favor of raising the spawn cost
Then Remove KH-38s from the Su-34 and just use the Su25SM3 if you want KH-38s. Its only a game issue
2 Likes
Anybody know if the developers changed the 2 lines of code yet?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/2oaaQ9IMIkKj
No we aren’t.
I never said SAL Brimstone was a problem, only IR/FnF ones.
It’s much relevant as everything should has it’s strong points, and KH is exactly that in the case of Su-34.
Maybe to a brain that’s lacking understanding of how balance should work.