This is not a photo. Its from a game / simulation.
And the game/simulation is based on documentation or else it won’t be possible
Yes it is declassified and from the National Archives.
In your own words, you can provoke this yourself. After all, they are too loyal to one according to documents and photographs, or even do not pay attention to all this documentation or documents at all, and bring others to the point that you need to already provide a classified Flight manual or something similar.
Sadly not at usable evidence. There is no proof of that.
Is the modification and the Tranche listed here? If not, then it’s just a piece of paper without specifics.
But based on this it’s shown that it’s possible to model double pylon AMRAAM isn’t that right?
If you have the front page with declassification stamp then please provide that as well. Otherwise there is no way for anyone to know if you are telling the truth.
There is no evidence to show it was a real loadout.
Pylons are universal and missiles do not interfere with each other or interfere with the aircraft. So, in theory, it would be possible to issue at least one universal pylon for each pylon under Aim-9/Aim-120/Meteor/ASRAAM.
Wait a minute… Is that todays typical “I claim it’s like that without providing evidence, now proof me wrong and do all the work to find evidence against it.” which exhausts everyone who wants to have sincere discussion? What a joke…
If the devs claim something is like that they should be the ones providing evidence, not us to do their work to refute their effortless claim. If they claim something they should also provide a source/evidence as the community isn’t the only one who should have to provide sources. If they can’t then it’s invalid like in the community cases, period!
But it’s there so it’s possible am i right?
We are not making any claims. We are simply introducing all loadouts that are known to be possible and clearly supported by well backed up evidence.
The 8 AMRAAM loadout sadly is not supported beyond proposals and CAD renders. There are no photographs and no credible materials to show it was integrated beyond just proposals.
Everything that has been introduced to the game from the Eurofighters AMRAAM loadouts is well known public information.
What another game / simulation has done is not valid evidence to prove its possible in real life at all.
The same reason we only have promotional images of an F-15 mounting 8 Aim 120s. Or the Ridiculous 6 Phoenix payload for the F-14
In real world situations you want loiter time and 4 Aim120s are enough.
Yet the F-15E gets a pass, because it could but never has in active combat.
Actually, the correct amount of BVR AMRAAMs it can take is 30 and the correct amount of 9L/i sidewinders available is 132.
Picture provided should suffice as evidence
In that case it would be good to enhance the wiki with the respective evidence used by the devs to provide things like loadouts, thrust values, fuel consumption, flight model, etc. so that everyone can check all the data used in game. This would be called transparency and would reduce the cases of unnessecary bug reports with valid evidence to shoot them down by linking said evidence in the wiki. Would be something to suggest as currently all used evidence by the developers is nowhere to be found regarding everything. They claim they have evidence but you cannot read it anywhere.
Had a laug, thanks :D
Can’t be used. This one has IRST sensor and can’t be accepted