After all, the main thing is documents, not photos? Documents come first. And the photos don’t mean anything (they complement the document at most). And the question with the Kh-38T/(ML the Su-25SM3) (why do the Su-25SM3 and Su-34 have them), because there is not a single photo with them!
This is not just about photos. There are no reliable documents to support this loadout either ever being realised either. So far it all appears to point towards a proposed loadout that was never adopted by any Eurofighter. So we have in game the loadouts that are well known to be possible.
1 Like
Even if it’s classified? Oh yea you guys didn’t accept that lol
Has the Su-25SM3 confirmed the possibility of using the KX-38 ML/T, has the Su-34 confirmed the possibility of suspension of the KX-38T and even more so 6 missiles?
Has the possibility of using the X-38ML/T on the Su-25SM3 and X-38T on the Su-34 been confirmed, and even more so the possibility of suspending 6 missiles? And is there any confirmation that the Su-25SM3 can carry 4 X-38s… because it can only hang heavy X-29s on 1 pylon per wing, and not on 2 pylons per wing, it cannot take them. Will there be a withdrawal of weapons or is it something else?
Hi, @Gunjob, could you also forward this bug: Incorrect vertical angle/coordinate of target on IRST display.
It currently affects EFT’s Pirate, Rafale’s OSF, and all other IRSTs (except for MiG-29 9-12 and 9-13, because their scan area is fixed).
The vertical coordinates of a spotted target are not properly displayed. Example pic:
The MiG-15 here is at the bottom of the scan area, but the IRST display shows it to be above and outside of the scan zone.
This is with Constant elevation of radar antenna set to No, btw.
PS: I am even sure if IRSTs should be stabilized in pitch, which seems partially be a source of the problem.
Guys, can we pls stop with this fucking pylon?
Yes we have some sources and an Pic of an Mockup, but we need an Real EF with it
Gunjob said allready that he will ask about the pylon the RAF after the Holidays so we can close this chapter once and for all, unless someone finds an real photo of an real EF…
I am Pretty sure @Smin1080p_WT would also love to finally see something else than talk in an cycle about these pylon…
6 Likes
Will there be documents or evidence that EFT can carry STRICTLY 6 Aim-120 and no more? Or it’s your guesses and assumptions. Our sources are there and we represent everything we find. But from your side, so far, only empty words from moderation and moderation of bug reports.
1 Like
Perhaps you will transfer this message to the Rafale topic, because this is a topic about EFT German.
Blockquote
It’s a clear marketing lies
Like provide some source bro
Feel free to make a separate bug report if you wish to do so and believe you have evidence these aircraft cannot mount this weaponary. This is a Eurofighter topic and I am answering about the Eurofighter report.
2 Likes
They are all affected by this bug, including PIRATE. ALL IRSTs (except for OLS-29) have this bug.
The only reason I added the picture of the Rafale is because that is the only aircraft I was close to on the DEV with new IRSTs.
It’s just that there are obvious double standards on the use of weapons and what is needed to confirm (whether it was used or not).
1 Like
I expect this from those who think or know that they cannot put these pylons on the plane. Why should I prove that something is not there (after all, this is the opinion of both yours and the reporters’ bug), my opinion and everyone else’s is the opposite. So whoever says that there is no evidence, he must provide documents (which say that there is some kind of restriction on electrics or software), but you are trying to tell your theories without proving them, so how can we believe all of you without documents?
Eurofighter is coming to the game with all of the loadouts proven to be possible on the aircraft.
You are attempting to suggest something, which does not have clear evidence, thus if you wish to do so, you are more than free to do. However without clear and conclusive evidence of it being possible, its not something that is going to be implemented, as we have explained numerous times.
I understand you disagree with this, but going down the whataboutism route is not going to change the outcome or acceptance status of the reports.
If you wish to submit a report for the removal of weaponry from Soviet aircraft, you are free to do so.
If you wish to provide new evidence for a report on the Eurofighter, you are equally more than free to do so.
Going around and around in this topic without any new information sadly is not going to progress matters further.
6 Likes
There are many documents from during development which state the maximum AIM-120 will be 6.
It is of course possible that the capability more AMRAAMs was added later, but the evidence for that is clearly not enough for Gaijin.
Is it possible to blacklist an word in an thread?
Because I cant see it anymore…
It’s just that all documents will be closed, we’ve already been through this more than once. There were no clear refutations to our documents.
Even better evidence…
should I steal documents from Germany or what? Or can Flight manuals throw everything in a row to confirm this? What would everyone turn gray and bald from such evidence?
Doing so will simply result in your account being banned. We will never use or handle such information.
3 Likes
And where are they? Or are you talking about optimal suspension options, where there is necessarily an outboard fuel tank. The optimal options for outboard armament do not show all the capabilities of the aircraft.
I have not seen any documents from bug reporters That indicate restrictions on the number of missiles for Tranche 2 Block 10-15
