The picture is nonsense
The MiG-29 is faster than the Su-27 and F-18, and the supersonic STR is better than that of the Su-27, F-16C=MiG-29 STR for the subsonic
1 Like
Well, this is mainly mod, 99% of all mods… change it, EVERY single one exept A-4 is absolute trash. Its not even on internal pylon… its on drop tank pylon.
3 Likes
just going to point out that faster isn’t the same as acceleration…
ex.
Car A accelerates to 60mph in 10 seconds but has a top speed of 60mph
Car B accelerates to 60mph in 15 seconds and to its top speed of 100mph in 25 seconds
Now the question becomes:
With the fact RB199s were put into platforms with lower speed requirements, is it possible that the channels were inherently designed for those lower speeds thus have less flaws for channel losses.
@Sean74218 @MysteriousHonza
Yeah, here’s Heatblur’s preliminary implementation: 8 missiles.
If this thing ever comes out, it will be miracle :D
There is an official EFT being worked on in DCS, made by ex Eurofighter pilots, engineers and mechanics.
Might be possible to ask for info from them, but i doubt theyd agree if they knew it was for a competitor game.
1 Like
I know, look above what i think about it, given how much is classified and how complex that thing is. DCS API cant support good portion of its systems i bet.
WT aint really competitor to be fair.
Well Eagle Dynamics and Gaijin see themselves as competitors, which is all that matters.
War Thunder doesn’t simulate a radar wire burning, but that’s okay.
Asking them for info is always worth a shot.
However if they go anlot by feel and memory we might have a hard time citing that.
But even if, it might be more marketing lies
6 Likes
Out of all Eurofighter rails which ones are MFRL?
Because the company producing them is stating that they’re able to carry AMRAAMS.
Spoiler
Most likely, each pylon is on the wing. After all, bombs can be hung on each pylon, and you can safely hang this universal pylon on these places.
Last I checked, the argument for the latest bug report regarding missing inner wing AMRAAM’s is that the outter wing station with AMRAAM is an ALDERU, the exact same ALDERU is on the inner wing pylon, and as such, both can mount the MFRL, and both could therefore mount a SRAAM or the AMRAAM.
Therefore, it is not a question of “if” the EFT can mount the AMRAAM on the wingroot ALDERU, simply a question of why hasnt it been seen irl, and if thats enough for gaijin to go through with it (it wont be).
The 6 AMRAAM thing is likely a balancing decision anyways, as is the datamined twin AMRAAM ejectors for the EFT. They allow gaijin to restrict weapons for now and have potential future growth if need be. Gaijin would never admit that though.
2 Likes
Can’t remember seeing Yak-141 with 4 ERs or su-34 with 6 kh38MT irl tho.
I get the balancing decision, but it could be carried out another way around, by blocking the amount of said AMRAAMs. With aim-120 on the inner wing we could possibly take 8 sparrows as well.
1 Like
Why do the moderators for the additional pylon for EFT write that there are no photos confirming our documents on the pylons on Aim-120. And are there any photos that confirm that the Su-34 / Su-25SM3 can wear them at all. I’m already silent about the photos where the Kh-38T/ML are suspended. Why are some people treated more loyally than others? What kind of double standards?
2 Likes
I know, and the MiG-29 is the fastest here except for the F-16,EFT
This is Kh-38ML, not Kh-38T
And you didn’t show the Kh-38 on the Su-25SM3
MT are very rare
Because the Su-25SM3 cannot use the Kh-38, this is a Gaijin invention.
Why then are the documents not a reliable source? Why are the photos of these pylons in the photo so important to developers? So many sources have already been cited to add 2 Aim-120 to each wing. That is, 8 Aim-120 without double pylons.
If there are no such photos, it turns out that logically for a Eurofighter, you need to delete the Kh-38T if there were no photos, or make as many of them as they were visible in the photo. If there were 2 in the photo, then put only 2 missiles.
Or the developers are trying to reduce the armament of the Eurofighter and try to cancel all reports in every possible way. Or why the reports don’t answer us as is (the reason of the developers)
1 Like
Because thus far, the configuration has sadly not been proven beyond some CAD mockups and proposed loadouts. Once there is evidence it is indeed possible, then it can be passed for consideration.
2 Likes