It is not amraams
Oh oops
I’m saying it would have to be the 2nd to the outer wing pylon because that’s the only pylon with double rails. Logical?
Do I have proof no, but where else would it go
1 Like
I thought that 2nd means second from itpsl to inner(centre).
I’m curious what Gaijin’s source is for the double amraam pylon if it’s implemented
I doubt it will, just will be in files like triple agm-65g, ECCM pods and etc.
I think someone on discord suggested the datamine implies its connected to the TMC Snap points, which I believe should theoretically support AMRAAM no?
1 Like
This is why they hid their names, so they say stupid things like that without being held accountable. .
3 Likes
Like a certain one while dealing with the mess of the Baz Meshupar, completely ignored all evidence while misusing and fabricating his own
Although in this case I think some numbers where miscommunicated to the devs so nothing with ill intentions on their end
Oh, no… Another admin replaced “accepted” with “not a bug”
1 Like
I think I’m going a little crazy :（
Dev updated again I think
Whats your version?
Is it 2.42.0.23?
yes
Then its allready old…
well I suppose that makes up for no AIM120 on the inner pylons, it weird they denied that but are adding the double rack.
They might be, there is a lot in the files that never sees the light of day
2 Likes
Can someone explain me recent FM changes?
It’s crazy how they have gone from people dealing with reports to deciding that they are now the leading expert on military weapons, directly going against official documentation because they ‘‘think’’ and ‘’ believe’’ that something can’t be a certain way like with the Stingers.
And they weren’t good at the former to begin with.
5 Likes