Sure, but here’s the problem.
First we had the F4 ICE fiasco and now, it remains to be seen what will come of the +EF, because it’s on the RedAir (still and for some reason) and fights UK/ITA (PIRATEed) Eurofighters.
I mean, GER TT already has abysmal WR…something like 4.9% vs 75% for the US at BR13 eg. so where’s balance there?
I’m playing SB. :D
Or how about the rule “don’t give a vehicle weapons it didn’t actually use”? For example, according to this rule, don’t give a German P-47 bombs. And then pretend that such a rule didn’t exist.
Whole lotta cope
At the moment, not a lot (im rarely using it in Sim at the moment) . If PIRATE ever gets fully implemented (which is doubtful) it could be a pretty powerful tool. But Im personally far more interested in things like:
Could LaGS maybe be considered in a short term as well? It doesnt require a new model or anything
buddy u best be quiet.
In the matter of the strv122 it does make a difference, keep your german bias out of this
This was closed by the developers.
The STR M0.6 at 3048 is 15.4, for SL is 19.5 for specified weight 15200 (4300kg fuel and 2 missiles) it matches close to specs from https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C18056750
EFA estimated STR for these conditions is 13.8 and 18.4, ESR-D specs is 20 and 15 9for unknown weight)
Serial aircrafts should be heavier and has empty weight estimated around ~11200 ±300kg. Typhoons description brochures defined and has fuel ~4600.4700kg (4650 in game), so terms “full fuel” from specs above is not applicable as full fuel for game aircraft.
It’s a shame that no one except the developers knows this.
am i talking about the IRST no?
but the armor in fact does make a difference, i did not say 2a7v is bad thats your whole hallucination working once again, dont make me embarras you again like last time, cause your whole takes are wrong
Proved that more then once
It not only doesn’t make it bad, it makes in probably 99% of the playtime absolutely no difference.
Is the presence of CLDP on Italian Tornado IDS instead of Litening 2, such as on German one considered similar key difference?
[quote=“luque13, post:6651, topic:835”]
Does the lack of Pirate make the Typhoon bad? No [/quote]
That remains to be seen and I already have a hunch.
Not really.
Eg: 109F/G early varians’ pilots commonly removed armor plating on the seat, to improve rear visibility.
We don’t get that in WT.
no they are not the same, because PIRATE isnt an essential part of the kit and is easily replaced trough the radar. While the armor is one of the bitggest matter of a tank which cant be replaced trough different aspects.
You seriously once again have no clue at all
The reaction the German players have is the same, that’s the point neither vehicle is suffering because of the omission of these systems.
before or after conformal fuel tanks ?
Given the Pic was from 2018 (though only a mock-up cant find any other sources for it at the moment) Im going to say before.
Was looking to see if hte Typhoon ever made use of a “ferry tank” like the Hindenburg tanks on the Tornado.
I’ve used it once to covertly shadow a target in Sim. Given its extremely limited implementation at the moment, its rarely of use.
field modification is not same as intended combat configuration, and its only 1 extremely specific example with little impact on gameplay