How about the “don’t introduce vehicles that didn’t exist in reality unless it necessary” rule? Then take out the Panther 2 and Tiger 2 105, add the Ostwind 2 and sell packs with it?
What is even the big deal about IRST. Outside of simulator it’s pretty much useless.
And with how many planes are flying around on a full sim server, there as well at some point.
1 Like
Evidence the developers have shows Ostwind 2 was a fully constructive prototype, which meets the games criteria. Nonetheless, this now just seems to be an off topic rant going off on a tangent. So lets please remain on track.
What happened to the sustained turn rate report?
2 Likes
Sure, but here’s the problem.
First we had the F4 ICE fiasco and now, it remains to be seen what will come of the +EF, because it’s on the RedAir (still and for some reason) and fights UK/ITA (PIRATEed) Eurofighters.
I mean, GER TT already has abysmal WR…something like 4.9% vs 75% for the US at BR13 eg. so where’s balance there?
I’m playing SB. :D
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Or how about the rule “don’t give a vehicle weapons it didn’t actually use”? For example, according to this rule, don’t give a German P-47 bombs. And then pretend that such a rule didn’t exist.
Whole lotta cope
At the moment, not a lot (im rarely using it in Sim at the moment) . If PIRATE ever gets fully implemented (which is doubtful) it could be a pretty powerful tool. But Im personally far more interested in things like:
- Blue Vixen Radar being replaced with CAPTOR-M
- BOL overhaul
- Proper DASS implementation (PD MAWS etc)
- Additional loadout options (A2G)
2 Likes
Could LaGS maybe be considered in a short term as well? It doesnt require a new model or anything
buddy u best be quiet.
In the matter of the strv122 it does make a difference, keep your german bias out of this
This was closed by the developers.
The STR M0.6 at 3048 is 15.4, for SL is 19.5 for specified weight 15200 (4300kg fuel and 2 missiles) it matches close to specs from https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C18056750
EFA estimated STR for these conditions is 13.8 and 18.4, ESR-D specs is 20 and 15 9for unknown weight)
Serial aircrafts should be heavier and has empty weight estimated around ~11200 ±300kg. Typhoons description brochures defined and has fuel ~4600.4700kg (4650 in game), so terms “full fuel” from specs above is not applicable as full fuel for game aircraft.
2 Likes
It’s a shame that no one except the developers knows this.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
- war thunder aircraft are always in combat configuration
- what does this even have to do with adding 5th gen aam to 1 airplane before everyone else gets theirs
am i talking about the IRST no?
but the armor in fact does make a difference, i did not say 2a7v is bad thats your whole hallucination working once again, dont make me embarras you again like last time, cause your whole takes are wrong
Proved that more then once
It not only doesn’t make it bad, it makes in probably 99% of the playtime absolutely no difference.
Is the presence of CLDP on Italian Tornado IDS instead of Litening 2, such as on German one considered similar key difference?
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
[quote=“luque13, post:6651, topic:835”]
Does the lack of Pirate make the Typhoon bad? No [/quote]
That remains to be seen and I already have a hunch.
Not really.
Eg: 109F/G early varians’ pilots commonly removed armor plating on the seat, to improve rear visibility.
We don’t get that in WT.