what do you expect? these same Incompetent thinks German Leopard 2A7V which is newer and heavier have less protection than Strv122 because Swedish trials say so. (The test was conducted it before 2A7V even born)
Well i guess we’ll never get the same handheld as their beloved Russia.
3 Likes
So they don’t have to give f4 kws LV aim9li-1
Aim-9M was given instead of 9Li-1 (although it is already with a smokeless engine)
Wonder what reason we are going to receive for that
1 Like
That is an incredibly stupid take since the the Camo they have in game IS LITERALLY FROM THE RED BARON. It’s just a different camo from the Squadron compared to the one I posted.
Also not a single other camo they could have added would have anything to do with any person. It was mostly Tiger-Meet camos
It doesnt show his face tho
What the hell? isn’t that exactly same missile?
In terms of ingame performance, yes. I still would have preferred to keep the AIM9L/I-1, just for the name
4 Likes
Weird I see Swedish have 9M with their own name (RB74M )
1 Like
same, if game performance is the same, just leave the missile with the more realistic sounding name.
Especially since:
@Smin1080p_WT why this change?
Hope they revert that change
Probs cuz there was evidence the 9L/i-1 didnt have a smokeless motor, so theyre removing it but didnt want a fit from the german community, so they did this instead.
2 Likes
AIM-9L/I-1 was found to not have a smokeless motor after all. So AIM-9M was issued to keep the EF-2000 Block 10 in line with the other two. We would have preffered to use a domestic missile (which is why AIM-9L/I-1 was added in the first place), but sadly its not possible.
10 Likes
Would it not be possible to make both missiles available? So with the AIM9M modification you get both the AIM9M and the AIM9L/I-1? Just to leave us the option to choose the domestic variant?
2 Likes
Oh ok that was definitely the right decision then, thanks for the answer!
This would defined be the best of both worlds
So smokeless motors are getting removed from sweden aswell?
Why would they remove it when the German EFT is keeping a smokeless missile?
At best you could ask to rename RB-74(M) to AiM-9M
Kinda funny you could add CM and missiles to the Y**141, based on what it could have/would have used but when shown a “Proposal”(mockups from the manufacturer showing it CAN/WOULD’VE used it) for the 2x AMRAAM mounts, its denied… due to… being a proposal…?
Yak-141 was a prototype that never reached production. So it has only the limited weapons it was proposed with (4 missiles).
Eurofighter is not just a prototype and reached production, so there is no need to rely on proposed weaponry, as its production weaponry already exceeds that of many other aircraft.
6 Likes