@Smin1080p_WT Can you answer why the German EF isn’t getting AIM-9L/I-1 or AIM-9M?
Can a bug report be made so that BOLL would be used with the Aim-120? In Simulation battles, the more false heat targets, the better.
because gaijin says germany is stinky.
I read somewhere here that it is because there is no official documentation for the aim9l/I-1 to proof its smokeless, it makes no sense to add something that doesn’t improve anything
Then why have the devs themselves said that the rb74(m) isn’t in fact aim9m, which sweden never had in service, but is in fact aim9li-1.
AIM-9Ls can use a reduced smoke motor
It seems like it because I’ve asked smin every day and he has ignored me
There isnt a single source that shows BOL on anything but the outermost pylon. Thus its highly likely that none of the removable pylons are even wired to use BOL (since that requires a connection to the DASS defensive system)
they said as well now that they arent sure it should have smokeless motor and its more likely that the swedish gripen should receive a nerf
But it still hasn’t been fixed conveniently has it? Almost like they left it in for parity or something.
then it can get AIM-9M, since it has muh technical capability
It just gives an error
ah, yeah their weird system i still got access trough since i submitted it
tldr i submited aim9m for germany already
Was it accepted?
Smin said it was ‘under consideration’ but this was 4 days ago
not accepted
Remember that the real reason isn’t that it’s inaccurate or that it’s bad for balance. It’s just that gaijin does whatever it wants often times to deliberately screw certain nations or vehicles over using half baked double standards they cross less than a week later.