Americans finally feeling OP cas. Tastes good.
this is what everyone else has to tolerate throughout every br. Decent fighters with massive bomb yields making ground unplayable. I’m just glad American pilots are the worst in the game.
2 Likes
complains about the ussr hasn’t touch it
1 Like
There isnt a lot of counter to cas in general. US doctrine is based around CAS, so hence why there is a lot of CAS. Mavs get the same effect as the Su-34’s attack. I got 7 ground kills in my f-111F in one run, Thats a bit OP imo but historically they plane can carry the load outs to do it just like the su-34 can. NATO countries do need help the the spaa area, but if they do people would actually need to spawn in them to help out the team, and maybe put in an air to air plane to take out incoming CAS.
Overall top tier ground maps need to be bigger and more spread out. It would help the game last longer, and wouldnt shooting fish in a barrel squished on one location. this would help out the most i think all around.
have you considered our lord and saviour: fighters to intercept CAS
What are you talking about? Before this, the Su-25 was the most impressive aircraft, because the Su-39, when the USA was the best CAS? If everything from the USA is constantly being nerfed, I recently raised a topic on the forum that Mavericks no longer fly further than 6 km and the AIM-120s were subjected to a serious hidden nerf.
In our game it’s the other way around. We have the best army in the world, the USA, which is the worst in the game, and the country with the most advanced air defense system, Israel, has the weakest air defense system.
Hm yes lets add iron dome to War Thunder, great idea. Also USA’s equipment is reliable and made for real life circumstances, which cant be account for in a v i d e o g a m e. They also rely on strength in large numbers which has been the case since WW2, although giving one team 60 players and the other 20 wouldn’t really be fair now, hmph, I mean the premium players would still probably find a way to lose. (also this is why BATTLE RATINGS exist so you don’t get Panzer 3s versus Jumbo)
and
(I point out that it’s humor, just in case.)
2 Likes
Mavericks are fine I literally got like 6 kills earlier in the F-5E and that was around 10KM firing range, you need altitude for the things to work. The AIM-120 is still the best Fox-3 in game currently. The SPAA gap has already been addressed by Gaijin and there will be more implementations within the next few months, I mean Jesus they moved the Tor-M1 down to 11.0 and the HQ-17 to 11.3, which gives me hope they will do that more with other SPAA (besides the pantsir). If you want to effectively counter CAS at top tier you really need an aircraft no matter what nation you are, as dodging any missile from any SPAA is quite easy and literally every nation has 20KM+ ATGM’s on capable platforms as well as Fox-3 carrying aircraft. Whether you like it or not this is just how it is, and even then you can’t win a game in an aircraft as you need to cap points in ground vehicles to win.
have you heard anyone in 9.0 cry when US main pull out their A-4E with tv guided bomb?
no? then why are you crying right here when other people does the same?
“Our aircraft and missiles are so advanced we don’t even need cannons on this new phantom we’ve made!” Proceeds to get smoked by mig-21s and have to add a heavy ass gun pod on them to stand a chance
2 Likes
they suddenly get dementia when people mention about AGM-65 at 10.3 and AGM-62 at 9.0
France ain’t shit imagine losing to a fleeing army, crazy stuff.
1 Like
Alright sure, now please tell us what can counter AGM-62 in 9.0?
no no, you dont get it. it is only bad if soviet get it. it is bias when soviet gets something that isnt terrible. but whenever US get it it is all balanced and fair
he also seem to forgot about TV guided missile that they get at 9.0
Use chaff? Duh. I mean realistically you can say this in any BR, you do have options like hiding behind terrain and using smoke but looking up or in kill log is way too hard for some players.
chaff? in ground arcade? in 9.0? where tanks hardly have thermal and most soviet tanks still rely on ESS? are you fine in logic department?
The US tech tree isnt bad. Yea i agree there are some issues but heres the thing with that, almost all the documentation for the abrams is still classified. US tree is mobile just not very survivable, the soviet tree use to be more survivable until they got their loader added into the game, but their tanks are still survivable, but horrible mobility.
You cant look at the win rate per nation because of how US mains play with one and done especially new players that have that one premium tank with 0 crew skill and no map knowledge. There is also the issue of playing high ranking br’s on maps made for ww2 tanks where there is much faster movement and kills happening a lot faster esp with modern CAS. Having bigger maps for higher tier game play would fix a lot of issue with game play. Just my two cents
Sure sure, let me pull out my nonexistent chaff in my
T-10M, Obj-435, T-55, T-62, IT-1, Shturm S, Obj 775, ZSU-23-4,
It’s a JOKE holy shit.