is this why you add the only stealth attack helicopter in history as premium?
5 Likes
If you are having issues with SL income, that’s on you.
That just laziness they are different aircrafts not the same, if you want the American play USA, if you want the Greek one play wherever it goes, And do you think in real life Leopards won’t go against leopards or F16 against F16? It’s realistic to fight F-16 in a an F-16
so what about Germany leopard? various unique leopard 2 not in game, their also lack of details? ohh,you add to japan one in this time, should I ask for the original Leopard 2 MBT revolution?
Have you seen the lack of German 8.0 and how horrible that br range is for Germany
If this is the approach that gave us the premium F-14D, then I’m honestly worried about what else Gaijin is going to decide isn’t “historically important.” lol
4 Likes
if you guys are adding copy paste vehicles can you please add the A-1J to america
Do you think the XP-55 had a course weapon?
Yes.
I’ve always suggested that researching a vehicle in its domestic tree should give benefits to researching the same in another.
So, if you researched fhe M44 in the American tree, It’s now less research in the export trees.
If you buy the M44, it’s less SL in the export trees.
Researching a mod on the M44 means less research on export mods.
Buying mods means less SL on export mods.
1 Like
Just wait for the F-22 or F-35 premiums, would not be surprised if this is why we got this blog post now, damage control for the copy paste mess that is about to happen when Gen 5 comes after the proposed you know what :D
1 Like
I love copy-paste for premiums.
I love uniquely made versions of tech tree vehicles for premiums [see Click Bait].
I love unique vehicles in tech trees.
And events… as long as it’s not a one-off version of a vehicle, I’m fine with them; there are 2 Porsche Tigers, many F-5s, et cetera.
Granted, in some cases if E-100 wasn’t event it would’ve been delisted anyway.
As long as countries operated copy-paste in general, I’m all for it.
Giving players options is always a win.
And while I’d love some of my favorites added sooner [AIDC FCK1], as long as others enjoy any vehicle added, that’s fine with me.
There are millions of players, and only one of me. I will always have a favorite vehicle to play even if something I care not for [BMP-1, or this update F-16AM NL & Mig-21 2000] is added, cause someone somewhere will enjoy those vehicles and that’s cool.
3 Likes
That had planned weaponry VAK and VJ never had anything planned and they were only to test the vtol idea
2a5/2a6 get much stronger turret armor compared to 2a4. Dont recall magachs having such improvements over standart m60. And leo2a7 has improved hull armor. Does magach have considerably stronger hull that m60a3? Which makes it actually different against average shell? No, it doesnt. It pops just like any other m60.
(Worse then a 2a5 with a 30 year old armour kit)
1 Like
Talking about leopards, before more of the Leopard 2 get added like the 2 RI, could we get the promised Leopard 2 DM rework done before we add any more?
You guys acknowledged that there is an issue there over 2 years ago, but still didnt go trough with it, and instead decided to continue add more and more leopards that are flawed.
For the same reason i am not confident in the Puma rework actualy being done, since we still are waiting on the fix for the leopards
2 Likes
Surely it’s soon :copium
1 Like
Honestly, I don’t have any issue with copy-paste vehicles, but there shouldn’t be cases where a premium vehicle has no tech-tree counterpart, like the Su-30 in the Chinese tech tree. It currently has no equivalent tech-tree version, even though China’s top/high tier needs a competent CAS aircraft. Also, premium vehicles should not be better than their tech-tree counterparts.
2 Likes
I was comparing it to 2a4 cause of reply above mine. Is it japan leopard from latest patch?
Pure nonsense
And let’s not forget this “duplicate vehicles” is the smallest problem in this game
2 Likes