Just wait for the F-22 or F-35 premiums, would not be surprised if this is why we got this blog post now, damage control for the copy paste mess that is about to happen when Gen 5 comes after the proposed you know what :D
1 Like
I love copy-paste for premiums.
I love uniquely made versions of tech tree vehicles for premiums [see Click Bait].
I love unique vehicles in tech trees.
And events… as long as it’s not a one-off version of a vehicle, I’m fine with them; there are 2 Porsche Tigers, many F-5s, et cetera.
Granted, in some cases if E-100 wasn’t event it would’ve been delisted anyway.
As long as countries operated copy-paste in general, I’m all for it.
Giving players options is always a win.
And while I’d love some of my favorites added sooner [AIDC FCK1], as long as others enjoy any vehicle added, that’s fine with me.
There are millions of players, and only one of me. I will always have a favorite vehicle to play even if something I care not for [BMP-1, or this update F-16AM NL & Mig-21 2000] is added, cause someone somewhere will enjoy those vehicles and that’s cool.
3 Likes
That had planned weaponry VAK and VJ never had anything planned and they were only to test the vtol idea
2a5/2a6 get much stronger turret armor compared to 2a4. Dont recall magachs having such improvements over standart m60. And leo2a7 has improved hull armor. Does magach have considerably stronger hull that m60a3? Which makes it actually different against average shell? No, it doesnt. It pops just like any other m60.
(Worse then a 2a5 with a 30 year old armour kit)
1 Like
Talking about leopards, before more of the Leopard 2 get added like the 2 RI, could we get the promised Leopard 2 DM rework done before we add any more?
You guys acknowledged that there is an issue there over 2 years ago, but still didnt go trough with it, and instead decided to continue add more and more leopards that are flawed.
For the same reason i am not confident in the Puma rework actualy being done, since we still are waiting on the fix for the leopards
2 Likes
Surely it’s soon :copium
1 Like
Honestly, I don’t have any issue with copy-paste vehicles, but there shouldn’t be cases where a premium vehicle has no tech-tree counterpart, like the Su-30 in the Chinese tech tree. It currently has no equivalent tech-tree version, even though China’s top/high tier needs a competent CAS aircraft. Also, premium vehicles should not be better than their tech-tree counterparts.
2 Likes
I was comparing it to 2a4 cause of reply above mine. Is it japan leopard from latest patch?
Pure nonsense
And let’s not forget this “duplicate vehicles” is the smallest problem in this game
2 Likes
Iirc its also better hull Wise then the 2a7V lmao
1 Like
they wont fix any issues as long as they keep profiting of cheap ctrl-c + ctrl-v
ya the first real one here
1 Like
You’ll ignore our complaints here like you ignored the F-14D TT-Version poll.
2 Likes
what do you think about the Ho-Ri or the x38 missiles from the Japanese SU 30?
It is not. Bm42 lol pens 2a4 hull without having to aim for weakspots. 2a7 hull requires aiming for weakspots even with bm60
The solution seems obvious then: just stop adding so many unnecessary premiums.
2 Likes
IIRC, the MB-326K was made by NovA29. It first showed up as premium, but after a push was made tech-tree.
With the revenue share program vehicles given to their maker for free, I’m assuming so this image is further proof.
Just add both tech tree and premium equivelants of new planes to the game. And people don’t want variants of planes that are either already ingame or have minimal differences (i.e F-16AM and japanese F-16, F-14D and F-14B).
That’s because a technical capability
Fake but has nothing to replace it