I mean in a similar vein the Rad 90 was also like that but given special treatment to actually work in game.
Realistic Rad 90 would mean no turret movement, no driver view unless the driver sticks their head out of the hull.
So I guess you’d only have gunner view to see
That part was never fully confirmed iirc but the turret was fully functional as it was a 1a4 iirc
I’m not sure if you could fire the gun when the turret isn’t even powered
(or might actually not be a functional turret at all)
I’d have to ask AspectofRage about it, his the most dedicated Begleitpamzer and Rad90 fan I’ve met, also CV90120.
Last I checked he was pretty sure the turret was unable to move I could be misremembering but I don’t believe I am.
Pretty sure all information says the turret was functional just the turret ring was the debated part
If the Ho 229 is in the game the Su-47 can be as well. Again you seem to be drawing an arbitrary line on what is complete enough to be in the game. There are multiple vehicles that weren’t complete or have little or poor data.
Are you being intentionally stupid here or not reading? Not trying to be rude here but I feel you massively misunderstand the differences.
Again the ho229 was a PROTOTYPE with PLANS to be ARMED.
While this didn’t happen during the war it allows for a unfinished prototype suggestion.
Su47 was a tech demo to show of the new wings most importantly NO PLANS to be ARMED. As it was a tech demo to TEST.
I’m not drawing any line here it’s literally what is enough for gajin you can read their exact requirements. Random tech demos do not fit that
Another big thing is none of the photos ever have it in a different position, the vehicle did have a weight installed to test the turret but I believe no proper turret ring was created for the prototype.
He is in there German discord as Con iirc so he would definitely have an answer for that
The turret is its own weird mixed bag being a modified version compared to the ones we see on functional models like the fact it’s lacking the commander sight module and such
It would have eventually been armed should its design have been adopted. Again I’m not for it being added to the game. My point is there are vehicles currently in the game that are less realistic.
Even if the turret itself is (was) functional, I highly doubt they bothered to integrate it further than making sure that it doesn’t rattle around lol
I remember reading somewhere that the turret really only served as weight to do accurate driving tests and see how the special wheels they designed deal with the weight
To add onto that, they did test both the Leo 1A3 turret and that experimental Leo 2 turret, so that would make proper integration efforts even less likely
DCT 2026!
“If it’s design was adopted” IT WASN’T. THAT WASNT THE POINT OF THE PLANE. Ffs man it was just to test the wing design never to have weaponry or anything close to that. It was a tech demo not something to be armed
Wasn’t actually in Russian service. It was a art piece iirc not actually in service
There are multiple vehicles in game that were never adopted. There are tons of prototype/never completed vehicles.
It is kind of amusing how upset one persons opinion is making you.
It was actually used as a decoy. It was not an art piece.
It was a ukrainian decorative replica of the Pz IV
None is arguing about protoypes or unfinished ones but you. There’s a HUGE difference in a tech demo to test a capability see f15 STOL or su47 and a prototype like f16XL or some Russian one 🤷♀️
Because your wrong.
Ah I used multiple sources. They may have had bad information.
Your hate feeds me.
