pretty sure you can pen its front plate with BR 365 no ? as it can pen the jumbos front plate cause it has normalization from its flat head round ?
are u french? ur typesetting is french? Tu es français ?
Jumbo UFP with the Soviet 85 is a gamble, similar to the Panther vs Jumbo UFP.
Can it? Yes, but only under certain conditions, which usually wont be met in-battle.
Generally youre gonna shoot the turret, or for normalization being insane, the idler wheel at nearly any angle
no whats type setting ?
In french all punctuation at the end of the sentence separate from the clause with a space. like urs.
fair, panthers are probs undertiered
TDs kinda need to nuke everything
good gun not much armour, probs the best argument of the bunch
TDs need to nuke but id still say the pershing is a superior overall.
Bold ill give you that, french mains make that 100mm turret work very well.
Yea fair enough. That thing shreds even tho its too slow to position as nobodyt ever expects it
nah just how i type im a just a odd individual
lol. I thought I found another french mate.
So in summary, you now understand the m26 facing 5.3 is fair?
M26 should be at 6.3
I’m just gonna say that, while you make a point with that, I think you’re thinking outside of actual battles.
The absolute chicanery that happens with T-34 armor, even against the short 90, is insane. I’ve played from both ends of the stick, and survived shots I shouldn’t, and made shots I shouldn’t be able to. The T-34 looks squishy, but it is not. Not until a bit higher up, anyways. The turret also always has a high chance to eat the round due to volumetric.
- This is at 500m.
- This is a LOT of pennable area for a full uptier facing a tank who’s sole purpose in life is to have a little bit of mid armor
- This doesn’t show the spots that you will still penetrate at, but that are not colored green because they have stipulations the pen analysis doesn’t want to look at.
most of them are TDs so the gun being good is a given. if thats all that can be used then there is no argument
they all get hammered by a competent pershing (i know thats basically impossible)
I am not crazy! I know he swapped those pen values! I knew it was 150mm. One after 149. As if I could ever make such a mistake. Never. Never! I just - I just couldn’t prove it. He - he covered his tracks, he got that idiot at the museum to lie for him. You think this is something? You think this is bad? This? This chicanery? He’s done worse. That forum post! Are you telling me that a man just happens to type like that? No! He orchestrated it! Gaijin! He released a patch that broke the entire game! And I saved him! And I shouldn’t have. I took him into my own hard drive! What was I thinking? He’ll never change. He’ll never change! Ever since he was 9, always the same! Couldn’t keep his hands out of my pocketbook! But not our Gaijin! Couldn’t be precious Snail! Stealing them blind! And he gets to be a game developer!? What a sick joke! I should’ve stopped him when I had the chance! And you - you have to stop him!
at least somebody got it @pooqich
I know the T34 armour is BS, ive played them and played against them enough. shoot the mantlet and its not only consistent but oneshots often
You’re looking at this under “ideal” conditions, and with the shell that does less angle pen. APHEBC is the funny one.
This is what you’re effectively showing
However, this should also be expected, being closer to what you might actually find (except for the turret position)
touche.
still firmly call it an unusually unfair uptier for the tanks mentioned.
Pen analysis is always a little wrong, but it is less wrong when you use the correct ranges and use your noggin to figure out what its lying about rather than misrepresenting the ranges you’ll probably actually be shooting him at.
You can pen the same picture I showed with the T-34-85 with a sherman with a 76, or with a panther, or any other relevant medium tank. Panthers can just UFP center mass the M26 generally speaking.