It just endless discussion in T-90M thread, trying (or tried, it shifts all the time) to argue which part of cyclogramma/time tables to be used (like, arguing that only shift to one/next round of carousel and actual load time (the fasted it can be) should be implemented rather than some averaged)
The time of Lec’s reloading changed before.
It’s still also a balance issue. Reload time balance needs a basic fixed standard as reference, and the standard in top br is T-72 type 7.1s, all the adjusts are based or indirectly based on it. That’s why gaijin didn’t want to change this.
China is ASEAN’s largest trading partner
I’m glad to see these were accepted, but has there been any updates?
Gaijin is avoiding its resposibilities of fixing errors under the poor excuse of “balance” when China Ground in Rank VIII is literally unplayable
Well. It looks the way it’s supposed to now ( maybe little details here and there that are off) but that’s about it. There’s still issues.
At the very least, VT4 specifies a reload time of 6.7 - a technical manual from Thailand
Then BVVD comes and says: No no no, if the Kytay vehicles get a buff, so are my T-72s and T-90s
Which i would rather happen than status quo.
So they will dont fix the Chinese tanks because of that sweden german and russia only must have good tanks okok (in real life leo strv and russian tanks is worse than ztz vt-4)
all chinese top tier tanks must have 6.5 - 6.7
or even better like 5.5
Guys, I have an idea. Gaijin says they enabled volumetric armor, so their data is correct. But the calculation of the frontal armor by trigonometric functions should be about 800KE, although gaijin later said that for APFSDS it is not possible to use trigonometric calculations. However, in reality, the composite armor layer of the ZTZ99A in data mining is 215mm, and in the game it is 150mm. Maybe the data used by volumetric armor is actually 150mm instead of 215mm?
it’s because the new model lacks thickness, when volumetric armor unenabled, it uses the 215mm data, when enabled, it’s real thickness will overwrite 215mm
Or maybe a new modification of ztz99a? Ztz99a2 if you heard about it
(Type 99A2 (ZTZ-99A2) - new dynamic protection + CIUS + KAZ with millimeter-wave radar + new sighting system + integrated motion control system)
APS ZTZ99A can’t change the situation, that’s just a copy-paste vehicle. We still have to address the root causes.
it has a new armour and can have a 140mm cannon
but yeah youre right we need to fix ztz99a first modification
Project 99-140 is still an ethereal mystery, and the only thing I know for sure is that the 140mm gun actually existed and had target data, but it is not clear if it was loaded into the car.
In my opinion, we should also start to focus on future additions if Gaijin adds ZTQ-15, VT-5. Getting 99A fixed is important, but if ZTQ-15 also has inaccuracies there won’t be much hope for Chinese TT.