Have you tried sending messages to reviewers on the forum?
Spoiler
not yet, I’m wating for the dev server open
Imagine having a Leopard 2, M1A1, and a couple Eastern style MBTs in one tech tree
too strange though, I don’t like the idea, a unavoidable M1 is enough.
Apparently delivery has started and the first batch are on their way to ROCA, someone saw them on trains to port.
1 Like
Techinally China already has T-34 and M4 “Sherman” in the TT, but hilariously enough, the US retrieved the Shermans at the end of WW2 leaving the ROCA of the time with only M3A3/M5A1 “Stuart”+some Japanese Type 97 “medium” tanks
1 Like
99A left turret and right turret armor have different protection values. I think Gaijin won’t deny this, must be a bug.
4 Likes
Isn’t, because they are indeed not symmetrical, so it is again down to us to say ZTZ-99A has the same armour both sides of the cheek… Also I don’t know where Gaijing gets their sources from, cause to me it seems like a bunc of nerfs.
This has been a problem ever since 99A was first added. They are not symmetrical but in x-ray view the armor package is the same thickness. It is a big problem, as without ERA the left turret side is vulnerable to most top tier APFSDS.
the base armor are same, the shape of ERA won’t influence
Still doesn’t explain why the left cheek would be weaker than the right one.
If this is a russian tank, it will be repaired soon.
4 Likes
idk
just fucking stereotipical shit like german sweden and russia makes great tanks other - no
I find it funny that they are giving anti-spall liner to PLZ-05, but not 99A/VT-4 etc.
6 Likes
I’m really going to laugh … The first vehicle of the Chinese faction to have an anti-spalling lining was a self-propelled gun, hahaha, even in the last model reset gaijin was not added for 99A
4 Likes
Gaijin say that reload stats are for balancing. What is so good about 99A right now? Only good thing is that it is fast. Armor is now very bad, 577mm APFSDS (Only better than Leclerc and Challenger 2) but also 7.1 second reload, worst top-tier firepower, and no spall liner like it should have.
5 Likes
*Only for manually loaded. If vehicle have autoloader then they demand time tables to balance around (it big annoyance on RU forum then talks come about balance of Soviet/Russian tanks and their autoloaders)
So on RU forum they are also trying to do something about 7.1 second?
I wouldn’t mind if T-72/T-90 autoloader get buffed along with Chinese MBTs.
2 Likes