something just like old ir softkill we have, not so balance breaking even with “the best we can expect”
and the spall liners lol
“Passed to developers”
sigh
2 Likes
I know this is not the place but can someone explain this bllsht to me?
How come 3BM60 can penetrate my heavily angled UFP while also having ERA on it?
Is this some kinda joke or another Gaijin fail moment?
Oh yeah there is a bug report for it. The VT4 UFP should ricochet but don’t currently.
4 Likes
1 Like
Found this thread by mistake, but I have simple question:“Did they change something ?”
Great work, I am not Interested in Chinese tanks but report is so well made. I ve read it through like a book.
It was changed, be it that it comes with silent nerfs.
I wish they fix all the issues that Chinese tanks had.
My favorite model is VT4 and it’s so sad that it’s missing a lot of features and has wrong implementations.
1 Like
Considering Gaijin’s bias against the CN TT and the CN Community, it’s literally impossible
3 Likes
I really hope Gaijin hasn’t forgot about the spall liners
1 Like
Im pretty sure they did.
1 Like
Yep. Snail strikes again. Why even bother accepting it when you’re not going to implement the changes lol
1 Like
Because stuff like this get accepted as suggestions.
And to be frank the evidence seems questionable at best
There is no way that the ZTZ99A has worse armor than the Abrams. Gaijin needs to buff it
2 Likes
Unless you have technical specifications on its armor layout they’re not going to touch it unfortunately
1 Like
They can at least add spall liners, fix reverse speed and ufp on vt4 and change reload speed to 6 seconds.
This way Chinese tanks will be much better than before.
1 Like
They can’t even fix the reverse speed on ZTL-11 I wouldn’t count on them fixing it for the rest of tanks…oh but if it was a historical nerf it would be applied right away!
6 Likes
damn and random sources for Russian things get used…
yea literal video evidence of the reload being 6+ seconds and they still don’t fix it