What is the reason of these different reply from bug reppporting manager(BRM)?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/DYtXuFH2K7l2
Well, no KH38mt purchased by RMAF, but “The presence or absence of supplies is irrelevant. Only the technical feasibility of using the weapons matters.”； While we’are now looking at Community Bug Reporting System
Reports on historical discrepancies require additional sources.
Is BRM playing double standards? NO evidence proving the excistence of KH38s, no purchase of kh38 @RMAF, but it can be given; Turning back to USAF(for example, and we can list GBU53, ARH Brimstomes, AGM84 Harpoons, AGM88 Harm, etc.) , these missles are proven by pictures and reports but cannot be given? Not engough enfo proving the existence of missles who appeares in pics and filght manuels, while Russian weapons can be given even without evidence? Is BRM playing double stadards? Is this game still following the “realistic” tag??? We need a convinceing reply from the forum manager.