According to the bug report site the RWR has been fixed:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/8gUCy5Pe0y70
I’ll remove it once I see what it entails, want to see its stats ingame
1 Like
Have there been any updates on the F16Is channel loss/engine thrust?
Kh38MT is hard limited by seeker lock range at 40km, “GNSS” is absolutely useless on TV/IR guided ordnance as you still need to obtain lock first before launch. Same applies to SPICEs. Even with said 40km hard limit you’re still fighting with unstabilized view, as targeting pod stabilization limit is 30km only.
Kh38ML as well any other laser+IOG/GNSS or straight GNSS have only flight model/battery time limitation, as those can be launched through map designated PoI. And here glide bombs have no issues covering 80km+ when dropped from low orbit.
The real reason we dont have grom-1 is its being outstanding when it comes to base farming in ARB. You could get two bases from like 50 kms if I remember correctly. So those excuses of gaijin are just have nothing to deal with real reasoning behind those weapons limitations. They just dont want to implement those straight away, leaving space for adding clones with “new next-gen ultra weapon addition”.
New camouflage added for the F-16I according to the datamines from @gszabi99:
• F-16I Sufa - “bat” - 107 Squadron “494”
9 Likes
im PRAYING F-16I will get python 4, atleast nerf it, seriously…
4 Likes
We need more squadrons represented in war thunder, this is nice though since we typically seem to get Manat more than any others
1 Like
Thank you for taking the lead on this. Israeli hardware rarely gets what it’s due in game.
I appreciate the work you & the community are putting into this.
13 Likes
And also WSO pannel got fixed
5 Likes
Fixed reports removed from main post:
• TGP Pylon gap.
Bug report: Community Bug Reporting System
Status: fixed.
• Incorrect RWR.
Bug report: Community Bug Reporting System
Status: fixed.
New Reports added to main post:
• SPS-3000 lacks 360 degree RWR coverage:
Bug report: Community Bug Reporting System
Status: Open.
• F-16s missing ability to carry GBU-39 on inner pylons.
Bug report: Community Bug Reporting System
Status: Accepted.
8 Likes
I think both the F-16D and F-16I sufa should be tagged as strike aircraft instead of fighters. The F-15I is designated as a strike aircraft, why not make the 2-seater F-16s in the same line, strike aircraft too?
1 Like
doesnt really matter anymore, since now we dont have “stacking” aircraft types in case of SP cost
1 Like
Strike aircraft have a higher base bomb reward multiplier
Spice-250 and GBU-39 use different launchers
Yeah no they use a different launcher and wiring