I think aim120b will be given
1 Like
I mean, what’s the point of implementing a split BR system for ground and air if you don’t use it later? Depending on how the SUFA is ultimately implemented, it could easily get a high, if not the highest, rating for ground. But with ARB, that’s a different story. As it stands now, 14.0 would simply be a bad joke.
1 Like
maybe the maws is already being count as a part that will depends the ARB, well f16c barak II doesn’t have maws
so the f16c barak II is in 13.7 ARB
You may be right, but that would be very small consolation. Defense is one thing, but going into the race at 14.0 with only six missiles and a worse flight model than all other F16s is simply not enough. Correct me if I’m wrong, but there is no other aircraft with less offensive armament than the F16 at this BR level.
AIR LORA
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/pGeS8JIp9B4f
RAMPAGE
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/FQ8i3dklfJAu
Edit:
Great…
4 Likes
Fixed reports removed from main post:
• Countermeasures total incorrect.
Bug report: Community Bug Reporting System
Status: Fixed.
• PAWS 2 MAWS system incorrect coverage.
Bug report: Community Bug Reporting System
Status: Fixed
• Engine nozzle visual model incorrect.
Bug report: Community Bug Reporting System
Status: Fixed.
• F-16I visual model inaccuracies.
Bug report: Community Bug Reporting System
Status: Fixed.
• MAWS name incorrect.
Bug Report: Community Bug Reporting System
Status: Fixed.
New Reports added to main post:
• Surbaisse’s reports above.
• F-16I missing DASH IV HMD.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/sXQDAkxmFtUI
Status: Accepted.
2 Likes
meanwhile kh 38