And also WSO pannel got fixed
5 Likes
Fixed reports removed from main post:
• TGP Pylon gap.
Bug report: Community Bug Reporting System
Status: fixed.
• Incorrect RWR.
Bug report: Community Bug Reporting System
Status: fixed.
New Reports added to main post:
• SPS-3000 lacks 360 degree RWR coverage:
Bug report: Community Bug Reporting System
Status: Open.
• F-16s missing ability to carry GBU-39 on inner pylons.
Bug report: Community Bug Reporting System
Status: Accepted.
8 Likes
I think both the F-16D and F-16I sufa should be tagged as strike aircraft instead of fighters. The F-15I is designated as a strike aircraft, why not make the 2-seater F-16s in the same line, strike aircraft too?
1 Like
doesnt really matter anymore, since now we dont have “stacking” aircraft types in case of SP cost
1 Like
Strike aircraft have a higher base bomb reward multiplier
Spice-250 and GBU-39 use different launchers
Yeah no they use a different launcher and wiring
How is the radar performing? does it have the same giant hms search zone as the f-16D?
To add to this, have gaijin added DASH IV yet or is it still the generic JHMCS ?
What is the difference?
Nicer HUD visuals and just a general improvement over JHMCS, functionally very similar though so it’d just be a nice domestic addition
Spoiler
4 Likes
Make a bug report for it
With the brochure and pictures of the system
There’s already an accepted report:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/sXQDAkxmFtUI
1 Like
SPICE 250 should be compatible with all SPICE 1000/2000 pylons // Gaijin.net // Issues
Labeled with “not enough info”
Tons of images exist of the israeli airframes at top tier carrying all types of SPICE, how on earth do they sit and claim not enough info
Can we tell to change and the color of the mfds will be like f16c block 40 barak ii because the 52+ have multicolour displays. its not very important .
1 Like
Double standards
