Also without
French TT wouldn’t exist
Also without
French TT wouldn’t exist
haha awful logic, what are you even talking about? Israel was not sold Rafales. Do I need to spell this out? LOL Greece has ZERO RELATION to Israel in ANY CAPACITY. ZERO. You might as well assign CANADA to Israel or MADAGASCAR
Do you read any news?
Do you?
My dyslexic ass could never
Either way it’s pretty obvious which one I meant either way so that was pretty pointless to bring up
Also ironic, really.
I’m sure you think that. Run along now.
Yea you might have missed some key points in Greek- Israeli relations
Do you honestly, and to preface, this is also an intelligence question (there is a right answer, you won’t answer it correctly), believe that because Greece has military deals with Israel, that this means they need to be a subtree? Do you think the USA should also be a subtree of Israel?
Here’s an idea, keep planes only in trees that they actually belong in, make sense? Rafale should quite literally be a strictly french jet with no other option for tech tree. Guess why?
Yea Isreal needs a subtree because it’s very weak in its current state, Greece - Cyprus were chosen as the subtrees, not the best choice but a good one
Yea agree, Rafale belongs to Greece as Greece operates 24 of them
No? It’s not a strictly French jets as it is been sold to a lot of countries, Rafale can be Greek, Croatian, Indian, Indonesian (?), in the future Serbian
Rafale to Russia when
No it doesn’t.
So put it in the correct tree. Guess which one that is??
I wasn’t asking
Say bye bye to all of rank IV of the French TT as Multiple other planes across the TT
Oh, what part did those countries have in the development of this jet or anything to do with it? Oh, nothing? Oh, they literally did nothing to it? Oh it’s literally 1:1 situation? France it is!
Stormshadow to su24m
Ok?
That means France can’t be a TT as there is no TT without an entire rank
Pls no, Serbia for Yugoslavian TT
Nope. Zero logic found.
Hell yea it does
No. Want me to say this again when you inevitably try to say the same?