Nice cope out!
Confirm even more that you dont understand statistics.
Considering that you cant comprehend basic, very basic concepts, it is me who should explain those to you :)
That’s a nice projection.
y’know O_HO if you weren’t such a jerk and started insulting a group without reason maybe everyone would agree with you
No seriously, why would I want to play with you and your negativity?
Again, more insults compared to actual engagement…
You’re the one who refuses to take on board what’s been said so much you proclaim that you don’t understand it…
So what was it that confused you? Nothing? Alright, then you won’t accept any point made because it doesn’t suit your statistics…
They can spawn the low BR vehicle to gauge how the team is going and what they face, so they don’t have to pull out their precious KDR best vehicle to make them have less numbers…
That’s about as simple as it can be… If you can’t understand this now, then there’s no hope for you… Just keep those blinkers on and put your fingers in your ears…
Bro I’ve been playing assault a decent bit the past few days with the 2S38 and it definitely works. Or do you think that it’s just a coincidence when a dozen tanks shoot at me, disable my tank, and then start ignoring me after I pop smoke and repair until I can get moving again.
Just over a dozen coincidences in a row… yeah…
This thread was created in December 2023.
Indeed it was… And it was bumped last week by the OP to try and tell me that I was wrong for absolutely no other reason than they seen me start posting on the forums and went ‘Oh it’s that guy, time to tell him he was wrong in a thread I abandoned a whole 12 months ago…’ …
You might as well start a debate with the people who claim that the bot planes don’t rearm rockets/bombs if they’re not shot down. (From my observations over 18 months of playing Ground Assault, they most certainly do, it’s a function of definitely time and possibly distance.)
They will never agree with you, because that would include admitting a mistake. If the available options are either that on one side, and on the other making a huge fuss over something unrelated as if that had been their main point the whole time, door #2 it is.
i did not.
Still a nice cope out!
Describing that you dont understand something is not an insult.
What?
I dont accept nonsense. I have proof, you dont.
Do you have any evidence that more than like 10 players do that?
And even more projections.
You are literally sabotaging you team but okay.
Let’s say that it is true. Can YOUR team see through the smoke? They cant, so they have to leave their positions and then they get killed.
let’s see:
Here i had to move thus almost instantly losing my spawn protection. Got killed through smoke before i could see them.
Here i spawned inside smoke. I had to move and got killed through smoke about 5 times. We lost the game because of that.
These were just a few i bothered to screenshot.
Do you think i am stalking you here? Buddy the world is not revolving around you.
I saw there were comments made and some time later i answered them.
I did not tell you that you was wrong. I showed it!
If you are popping smoke within the base where many of your team-mates are, you are doing two things besides maybe allowing yourself to repair…
- pi$$ing off your teammates because the smoke inhibits their ability to target and kill the bots
- helping the bots - they don’t need to kill players to win. They just need to get within the cap zone and drain tickets. If the players can’t target the bots because of smoke then the bots get an advantage.
If you’re off by yourself and pop smoke that does not affect other players - no problem.
But if you do it in base - you are being selfish. Just respawn - it’s faster and does not hurt your team.
1 Like
Lmao at this massive schizo debatebro showdown of a thread. The funniest thing is that the premise of the topic post’s argument is wrong. Smoke actually works against the bots, and it’s pretty obvious that it does. Same logic used in the target detection, or the enemy rendering, or how sound works. Therefore the argument presented by OP is valid, but isn’t sound.