Well since it should have Home-on-jam as a fallback option it doesnt really matter anyway
Pars 3 too, since 2019 without top attack.
This video proves otherwise.
Let’s use basic math: which is bigger, 3 kg of explosive mass or 12 kg?
1 Like
Tor Is also very annoying to kill with f&f missiles, I saw my brother fail to kill a tor with 6 spike ers, you need to hit the crew comprtament cause the missiles don’t blow up on that thing.
But I think what he meant was that saturating multi vehicle spaas is incredibly easy with 16 missiles, but it’s not much harder with 8 as you can fire from the helipad much the same.
And if gaining does nothing about the IR forcefield and the magical radar stealth of helis it’s going to keep being irrelevant
Yes, as for saturating the SPAA, I can do that with the Tiger UHT itself. The problem is that it doesn’t have the Mi-28NM’s force field, so it only has time to fire a maximum of 4 missiles, and that’s if the SPAA takes a while to find me and I find it quickly. It’s much harder than those unskilled idiots who hover 10km high immune to all missiles thanks to Gaijin’s magic.
Regarding the idea that quantity is better, that’s false. The other new missiles are very similar in performance to the Pars 3 itself, except for range and such, but the trajectory failure, lack of overpressure, etc., are similar. And with the Pars 3, sometimes even 4 missiles don’t kill a tank, while the Lmur is much faster than anything else and always kills with 1 missile. If NATO had a helicopter with 30 missiles, it could be equivalent to the 8 of the Mi-28, not to mention the lock-on problem… in the Tiger UHT, many times you are seeing more than 60% of the tank’s visual and even then it doesn’t lock on.
1 Like