There can always be a 4th
1 Like
No chance.
1 Like
Why not? It has a stabilizer similar to the Sherman’s according to the blog.
Not to mention the added weight to the vehicle.
At this point just give us the … M110 I think? I’d send a photo but the only photos I have show myself in them.
1 Like
I know Germany can get a local variant and so can China via Taiwan but that’s all I remember
1 Like
My Guess is 6.3 br. Due to STAB.
1 Like
Tbh I think it will be BR 6.0 stuff. No way that it will be 5.7 with stab similar to Sherman one (its actually pretty big advantage). BR 6.3 is probably too much.
1 Like
6.0 would mean it’s equal to the T86. Which would be silly.
It wont be silly. Same armament, much better mobility, no armor but more space inside. That T-34 wont be on the same level as the Jumbo. The Jumbo has too effective armor and mobility is not that much worse.
2 Likes
Yay
1 Like
I think this could perform better or equal to some of the premium 6.3br T44 tanks. There are many higher br tanks without STAB.
You seem to completely not understand how big of an advantage stabilizer is.
It’s not about hitting shots while going 50kph downhill on uneven terrain.
It’s about your gun not bouncing around when you stop.
If both you and your enemy stop at the same time, the person with stabilizer will always shoot first by a huge margin. It also allows you to much more safely peek corners and hit insane snap shots as long as you just slow down a bit.
76 Shermans without their stabilizer wouldn’t be 5.0 - 5.7, but rather 4.0 - 4.7 as that would just make them glorified Panzer IVs. This is how big of a difference stabilizer makes.
1 Like
I suppose let’s start moving the 5.7 jumbos up to 6.0
Anyways, I completely disagree, it’s being blown way out of proportion just like any new announced vehicle.
5.7 Jumbo doesn’t have a soviet 85mm cannon.
With it’s pathetic 75mm, it’s a miracle that it isn’t absolute dead weight at it’s current BR. It only works out somehow due to insanely quick reload, still somewhat decent armor and - you guessed it - the stabilizer.
T-34-85 Taran will be 6.0 at the very minimum.
2 Likes
It’s not. You are just mad you don’t get to bully anyone with a stabilized T-34-85 at 5.7… or just don’t understand a thing about how the stabilizer works in this game
I’m mad? Please. I’m just stating the obvious, there are literal people on this thread saying it should be 6.3 🤣
It’s just proving my point.
1 Like
There is no way it will be 5.7 while being a direct upgrade to an already good tank. I’m thinking it will be6.0/6.3, any higher will make it DOA.
3 Likes
It very well could be 6.3 and quite frankly it is the most likely BR for it.
Just so you know, having or not having stab in this game instantly lowers the BR of your tank.
Just as an example, the soviet PT-76b is known for it’s stab and it is the sole reason for it being at 5.3 with such a horrible platform. What many people don’t know that there is also now removed from tech tree chinese PT-76 at 5.0 - just without a stabilizer.
Guess what, the soviet PT-76b although still disliked by many people due to it’s low speed and bad ammo choice, is still a fairly usable and fairly well performing thing, while chinese one, even at lower BR, is considered one of the worst tanks in the entire game for it’s Battle Rating.
Having or not having stab makes the way you play the tank entirely different. You just need to actually know how to utilize it
Exactly. I’d say 6.0 is a fitting BR for it, T20 should probably also go down to match it.
It absolutely won’t be a bad tank even at 6.3 though.
3 Likes