[Development] Discussing reports related to the Challenger 2 MBT

[AlvisWisla]

I state identical takes as all my fellow bug reporters & researchers and I get attacked.
I defend & want Challenger 2 to be accurate… I get attacked.
Just lol
And apparently defending Challenger 2 is defending Russia…
Then I’m the one provoking even though I never once made a hot take in these conversations.

Me: Challenger should be fixed. I’ll defend NATO.
“That’s provocative!”

TOW-2s and Viks both have 800mm of pen and a similar 5kg warhead.
Also Rooivalk remains the best helicopter, complimented by Challengers.

[Mytho-GR1]

@AlvisWisla

Rooivalk

Can’t buy it anymore

[Lord_Prism]

Now matter how often Razervon changes their name, the tactics remain the same

[AlvisWisla]

Yeah, it’s sad.
Definitely was a sleeper heli.
Which proves more than anything that Ka-50s today are almost all legacy purchasers.

@Lord_Prism Zero times really.
My sincerity & desire for impartiality will remain the same.

[Mytho-GR1]

I got it just before it went it is nice

[SlowHandClap]

@AlvisWisla

Zero times really.

So now you’re even denying you changed your name?

@SlowHandClap

A wise man once said: don’t believe anything until razervon has denied it.

I remember when trolling meant something.

[warhead_beast]

@AlvisWisla

Rooivalk remains the best helicopter

Z-10 has same range and the strongest AA missiles in the game, Tiger and A129 have Spike ERs, Ka 52 has 12 vihkirs plus radar, hell I would probably even prefer Tiger UHT over it even if it has only 7km in range.

[Mytho-GR1]

Fire and forget is very nice on those

[AlvisWisla]

Ka-52 requires aiming for weakspots, but it’s good once you’re consistent at that.

[Hartsy1]

Man you literally have the worst takes I’ve ever seen on this forum, i genuinely question if you even play the game.

[AlvisWisla]

All of my takes are from experts or when they don’t exist in the area I found something in, myself.
I’ve played every non-F&F helicopter and saw the devastation of TIGER UHT back in the day.

So yeah, if you think my takes are bad, don’t watch skilled CC videos.

[Kanelikainalo]

@AlvisWisla

TOW-2s and Viks both have 800mm of pen and a similar 5kg warhead.

Ok i got the pen wrong. Nice argument against better range, speed and guidance type.

@AlvisWisla

lol All these people attacking NATO just cause I’m defending NATO.

You are insane.

[Lord_Prism]

[Hartsy1]

War thunder experts lmafo!! Cringe overload

[Lord_Prism]

@Kanelikainalo

You are insane.

Nah he does this all the time, he tries to accuse people of hating the things people are trying to fix

[AlvisWisla]

Those that don’t listen to experts are bound to not learn.

@Lord_Prism
Challenger 2 should be as accurate as possible no matter what you say.
I’ve never once attacked anyone seeking to fix vehicles.
In-fact, I’ve helped dozens of people with fixing vehicles.

The forums are public sir, personal attacks on NATO players won’t help discussions.

[John_Sneeeeeeeew]

Am i the only one who thinks the rooivalk sucks, i always seem to do better with the lynx

[Hartsy1]

Ohh ok sorry bro, Gandalf the wise of war thunder over here with opinions based on other people experience who are so called experts lmao. Meanwhile dishing out the kinda points of views you’d expect from a level 3 and their premium Abrams.

[AlvisWisla]

SPAA players are better than the past.
Ka-50 and Rooivalk performed far better before SPAA players caught on.
It’s why I recommend people take fixed-wing instead of helicopters in general.

@Hartsy1
Didn’t know level 3 players had 2 - 10KDRs.

[John_Sneeeeeeeew]

Not that true, it always seem that im the only AA player on my team, and i still do better with the lynx even at top tier.
The rooivalks missiles seem very unreliable.