Ok i got the pen wrong. Nice argument against better range, speed and guidance type.
You are insane.
3 Likes
War thunder experts lmafo!! Cringe overload
Nah he does this all the time, he tries to accuse people of hating the things people are trying to fix
1 Like
Those that don’t listen to experts are bound to not learn.
@Lord_Prism
Challenger 2 should be as accurate as possible no matter what you say.
I’ve never once attacked anyone seeking to fix vehicles.
In-fact, I’ve helped dozens of people with fixing vehicles.
The forums are public sir, personal attacks on NATO players won’t help discussions.
Am i the only one who thinks the rooivalk sucks, i always seem to do better with the lynx
Ohh ok sorry bro, Gandalf the wise of war thunder over here with opinions based on other people experience who are so called experts lmao. Meanwhile dishing out the kinda points of views you’d expect from a level 3 and their premium Abrams.
SPAA players are better than the past.
Ka-50 and Rooivalk performed far better before SPAA players caught on.
It’s why I recommend people take fixed-wing instead of helicopters in general.
@Hartsy1
Didn’t know level 3 players had 2 - 10KDRs.
Not that true, it always seem that im the only AA player on my team, and i still do better with the lynx even at top tier.
The rooivalks missiles seem very unreliable.
Lynx is good and a lower br but rooivalk missiles have more range
Yeah I know the rooivalk is ‘better’ in every way, but I just do worse with it at the same BR lol.
Ohh im sorry, drop another flex and ***t opinion whilst your at it, noone gives a ***t about your KD in war thunder lmao. You couldn’t be more out of touch with the community if you tried. Literally all your here to do it try and derail another challenger 2 post.
Honest question: why do you think majority of your comments lead to arguments and “attacking” you?
2 Likes
Jealously over his K/D probably XD
Misunderstandings. 100% people misunderstanding my point.
The alternative is malice, which I don’t believe anyone on the forum has the intent of malice when starting discussions.
I’m guessing you haven’t actually run chaff against any sort of Radar missile at top tier judging by that last statement I have no idea if you have, just… that’s not how SARHs work from my experience.
Chaff works. The trouble is it only works a) when your opponent is not using a PD/PDV radar mode, and b) if your opponent is using one of those, you need to be notching anyway and utilising ground clutter too ideally(the optimal strategy for defeating SARH shots) for Chaff to work best.
I have seen suggestions if you pre-chaff you can deny a lock however I’ll admit quite happily i’ve never tried that enough to know if it works.
Then maybe you should do something about your arguments?
It’s impossible for everyone to just misunderstand you every time.
Why do you keep deleting and editing your comments, if it’s just us misunderstanding them?
Yeah ofcourse it’s everyone else except you.
3 Likes
@Kanelikainalo
I do, when I’m not playing a game during the misunderstanding.
Editing comments is how people clarify posts without adding new posts BTW.
And no, it’s not everyone, it’s a tiny amount of people.
Alvis mate he literally is on the Chally 2 thread and chucks up helpful/useful/supportive docs when he can…
I seriously doubt he’s mag-dumping every NATO player he sees for “being stupid”
I mean alternatively, for example, if you want to look at it this way, saying Abrams players are worse might be insulting but according to the best data we have is also factually correct
6 Likes
That is also dependent on having enough CMs to waste.
In something like the Tornado Gr1 you just dont at the moment.
Though if I had my full 1200 chaff (ignoring the 2x BOL it should have as well)
I’d be dumping enough Chaff to cause an ecological disaster before they even fired
3 Likes