Su-22M3 cannot fight normally on 11.3 battle rating. It’s 6 r-60mk does not give him superiority that explains that br. Su-22M3 can’t fight against more modern planes: it has VERY bad maneuverability (even phantom can easily win dogfight with you), very small amount of countermeasures, no radar at all, rockets that can’t kill even from 2 km without enemy flares, a gun with “slow” ammo. Even R-60MK can’t help to win once:
in the card we have an overload of 30g, but they never get 30g overload, also all your enemies have at least 30 flares so even 6 rockets won’t give you a chance to beat someone. Every enemy can easily run away from your blind rockets at this BR.
In case of reducing of BR SU-22M3’s stats shouldn’t be changed, otherwise it will become even worse.
It designed to be attacker not fighter, those R-60’s are for self defence buddy.
You are not right. For example F-5e FCU has 4 rockets, but they can lock from 3 km, with radar from more distances, has good maneuvarability, also can take huge bombs, so your logic that it’s attacker and r60s just for defence is not right, according to that logic su-25bm should be at 13.3 due to r-73.
ARB is entirely only favor fighter, it dont even get attacker air spawn,
it is justified to reduce the BR
F5 is a dedicated Jet fighter, seems like you dont know the difference between Fighter jet and attacker.
Personally i dont mind if its br reduced but one thing for sure that expecting to perform on same level with fighter jets while using dedicated attacker is simply too naive.
Seems like you cannot understand the reasons to downrate su-22m3. F-5 on the same br and its br is proved. But su-22’s br is proven by nothing, only by “strong” (in 1 case of 1m) r60mk’s. You think that it’s an attacker and has WORSE stats, so it should play against interceptor with good stats? The only name of class “attacker” says that it’s br should be decreased.