The numbers I have given are not from any of the public lists like those from Dontkev/WreckingAres. Instead, the total numbers of 90 for Rafale and 66 for Eurofighter are the total number of reports according to Gaijin so they include both public and internal reports. Gaijin’s list is more accurate as it is what the developers see.
Constantly saying in multiple threads that X is bugged, Y is unrealistic, and Z needs to be fixed for X and Y reasons won’t change the fact that no one in this forum can take control about which problems get fixed and which don’t. Can we finally stop with this and go on? It doesn’t help anyone, it only fills threads with hundreds of unnecessary posts and pressure on Forum Mods.
I am not saying you can’t discuss about things that are wrong or missing, but these discussions shouldn’t reach such dimensions, that we need a Part 2 of three entire threads - everyone who deals with the matter knows that XYZ needs fixes.
I totaly aggree though it was the usual bait that lead to the discussion
Spoiler
Tbf, there’s no reason other players should stoop to their level and engage with said bait, so both parties are at fault here.
I think EuroBros forget that IR AASMs are still missing most of their functionality such as LOAL automatic target recognition as well as its ability to be slaved to Spectra. If the devs implemented that it would make the Brimstones look like stone age technology lmao
(Ah yes, talking about the Rafale’s armament is ‘off-topic’)
You do know that Brimstones have the exact same capability and have had it since they entered service right?
In fact the Brimstone can do it better because it uses a MMW seeker instead of IR seeker and where the Rafale is limited to only 6 the Typhoon can carry 18 of them. Brimstone 2s match the range of the AASM, Brimstone 3s beat it and the Spear-3s blow it so far out of the water that its kinda hilarous to even try to compare them.
I know the Rafail holds a special place in your heart, but in this regard its so outdated its hardly even a competition. Heck, its so OP that gaijin has to give the Typhoon the earliest possible variant of the Brimstone and nerf so hard through the floor its hardly even recognisable as the weapon system its meant to be depicting
He’s just baiting you, leave it be
Yeah, still hilarious how much copium he has though
Especially as France was considering acquiring Brimstone 2s and I think i’ve even read somewhere they wanted to fit Spear-3s onto the Rafale
Speaking of which, Spear 3 is going to be on F-35 right?
Yup.
Been intergrated even before Meteor
Have any been in the possession of the USAF/USMC?
I’ll take this to another thread, 1 sec
24.6G with no wing break.
224% the 11G max stated for emergencies…
Gotta check some other jets, but this is insane.
Yea. “Recognition” is indeed there.
Right after it is a “Identification” tho.
Gajin where is my IR mode /s
Well i think i can rest my case here no need to continue
Brimstone isn’t IIR.
So what? It’s probably even worse than I expected?
Guys, please stop wasting your time with this troll, and please move this to an appropriate thread.
This whole argument is kind of silly in the first place, AASM and Brimstone are different weapon classes. Dont even think AASM can actually hit moving targets without laser assistance (seeing as the AASM’s own datasheet states the IIR seeker is for precision strikes on facilities, and that the laser is for strikes against moving targets), and Brimstone certainly cant deal any large scale damage to buildings like 500/2000lbs bombs could.
Spoiler
You’re arguing apples and oranges with a troll that has nothing better to do than waste your time while he sucks off french tech waiting for a mod to come remove all your comments for being off topic.
Stealth
You are also to blame for the degeneration of this thread, which should be a resource hub for technical reporting, by constantly bringing in angry people with stats and comparisons to other fighter.
Please don’t try to make yourself a hero trying to fix it now.