and i understood that : what i am currently suggesting is to work out this problem as MICA-EM is the ONLY missile from top tier to not have recieved it’s true max range, being held back by 37.5%
also i’m trying to discuss here, not willing to make a fuss ^^"
The Rafale feels quite great now, the only downside is the impossibilty to fly at regulated speeds with ab (even at 102%) without breaking the wings
No removing of the amount. if in real life it carries 8, let it carry 8, no matter the performance.
But lets keep harassing for MICA performance to get fixed.
Casually ignoring PL-12 and R-77
Please, just dont consider them fine as rafale gets 8. You can always remove 2 of them or ability to carry it on wingtips if fixed mica becomes balance issue in that increased number. Afterall, we all would be fine with correct mica and having “only” 6 of them.
You can rip at 101% as well, if you fly completely straight for a minute. I am learning to use super cruise most of the time and switch to afterburner only in turn fights
Sry i had wrong tag, even then, iam fine with 6 of AdA if it means they are correct. They should be pretty damn good so you can actually use that AESA radar with them in BVR with decent PK.
Yeah, that’s quite infuriating
I did not ace it now, with all the modif, whats the max kph speed at deck in supercruise?
Well…if we are given 2 additional Mica because of their testing by Dassault, then I have a question:
Were the AASM-1000 tested on the Rafale F3, for installation under the central pylon instead of the GBU-24?
I am 110% with you but I just do not stand with artificial nerfs & buffs.
The community whine destroys this game and WHEN micas get real performance we BETTER have the real amount as well.
BECAUSE if you manage to die to any fox 3 when there is a 100% safe shield from fox 3s when you fly low… it is a skill issue as always.
This is not directed to you fyi, just to people who whine about missiles being too good if they are behaving realistically.
Removing the beautiful wingtip pylons from any plane is basphemy, if it was a balance concern they can just remove the extra pylons post buff.
Its not though, if that fox3 comes from really high altitude under angle and you dont time it well with maneuvering, it will smack you anyway, no matter your altitude. It might not outright kill you but often, you wont return or wont be even able to shoot back.
Yea, Magics on wingtips are ugly as sin. Rather remove pylons :D
In my opinion it is, you aren’t the first person to tell me this but I haven’t experienced it, guess it is most common in RB.
What you can then ask for is stronger multipath, not an artificial aircraft nerf / buff
Any information on HMD status? Rafale F3R is tested with Scorpion HMD so it should not be changed with any other Export version.
Oh yeah, in RB its normal. I might actually have more kills on multipathing planes than high alt ones in past 5 battles.
Stronger multipath wont help, anytime it comes under high angle, you are always in the way of the missile aiming for the ground :D
R-77 max range is 80km (the in game missiles are no R-77-1 with 110 km, neither do they’re R-77M with 193km):
currrently not missing anything
Pl-12
If we consider the chinese variant, it might be missing 20km range : from an USA source.
Yet considering SD-10A missile (export variant), those missiles are limited to 71km range, andfrom which sources might be easier to get.
In game the missile reach 80km which is on par other fox-3 missiles.
so at best it’s only missing 20% of range <37.5% (so yes, MICA-EM is the only one held back that much)
if you want to speak more about those missiles please be my guest and create bug report on those aswell, or specific threads.
This was forwarded for review today (the new info).
Great chats today guys. Hope to see a proper Raf asap!
Have a good evening to all.
Datamined value means just around nothing. R-77 suffers from excessive drag in game which cant physically allow it to hit even at 50km in favorable conditions