I never said it’s advantageous over the full-vision system; it’s a technology that has advantages and disadvantages, and more modern systems are obviously more efficient.
Moreover, what I mentioned about the advantages of the eyeplate display doesn’t apply to more modern systems because they are systems that project onto the visor and not onto a plate (as in the case of the F-35). Technological developments in displays and materials have made it possible to reduce the flattening effect on these viewfinders, which is why the new models achieve this result.
it was about the Brimstone seeker, or something and a certain person that is active in here was like:
“I dont accept these sources, because it dosent line up with my views”
(atleast thats what i got from those messages)
Isn’t Scorpion originally American though? Dont get me wrong I’m sure it was changed to work with Rafale better, with the stuff it displays and everything, but it should be a copy paste US Scorpion no?
And Scorpion was originally from US company, but then Thales bought the HMD part of the company. I know this because I’ve asked a related question before (is the scorpion HMD on ANG F-16 the same Scorpion HMD on Rafale?)
It quite easily survives 20g+ pulls with varied fuel loads and full MICA loads, well above gaijins stated 1.5x max G-load multiplier, which would need to be 16.4G irl to match the G-loads its able to pull and survive in-game.
It seems the only real limiting factor this airframe has are the lift limits and speed limits of the wings.
@k_stepanovich Will we ever see implementation of multiple search beams for AESA radars? AESA radars are capable of having multiple radar beams for searching in modes such as TWS.
