Can we stay on topic and this not the place for arguing with each other if you want to move that conversation to DM’s instead.
7 Likes
Su-27 doesnt really need it’s Radar as much though as it thrives in the short to medium range late game. It’s weapon systems are designed as such R-77 and R-73 and even R-27 are all pretty lethal in short range.
Typhoon really needs to be able to use it’s Radar to make that limited payload count.
We are also comparing an older mechanical scan Radar with the most advanced mech scan Radar in the game.
Are you for real?
I wouldn’t say it’s fm is correct after I’ve just seen a screenshot of the ravioli pulling 24G 💀
2 Likes
Don’t you see this warning?
Looks great! Not to be a beggar but could we maybe get some in this camo if you get the chance with that friend?
And maybe help out a little here too ;)
1 Like
I’ll definitely give it a try
1 Like
Peak right there
1 Like
Differences in Typhoon and Rafales radar is pretty relevant.
by all means report it
Bringing up “EFT” again in a thread where you’ve been warned multiple times doesn’t show good intentions.
Please go to the EFT thread
1 Like
ngl having the “screen” only in front of one eye seems kinda bad
something something russia did that in the 80tys /s
1 Like
Perhaps for some technical/economic reason that is unknown to the general public :)
but it seems weird to me having it only infront of one eye
like imagine the eye-strain from playing VR but only on one eye and also clarity could be a problem with one eye not being able to see the display
Having the screen on a single eye is a slightly more considered choice than it seems. It allows for a sense of distance (HMDs can cause a “flattening” of what you see). Having it on only one eye allows you to have both the information and this perception.
Furthermore, the system can be moved on the helmet, allowing it to be positioned in front of the pilot’s “aiming” eye. And since the way you see things is based on this eye, it doesn’t impact the perception of information at all.
8 Likes
These are actually beautiful
2 Likes
Considering the Striker 1/2 HMD and F-35 JSF HMDS all using a full field of view HMD the idea that a monocle based system is advantageous seems not to hold water.
As @ron_2303 mentioned its old 80’s tech, sure the newer symbology is there on newer systems like the JHMCS II but you’re still limited in field of view pretty massively. Which means you need to move your head/neck around more.
Striker II;
JHMCS II
7 Likes
I never said it’s advantageous over the full-vision system; it’s a technology that has advantages and disadvantages, and more modern systems are obviously more efficient.
Moreover, what I mentioned about the advantages of the eyeplate display doesn’t apply to more modern systems because they are systems that project onto the visor and not onto a plate (as in the case of the F-35). Technological developments in displays and materials have made it possible to reduce the flattening effect on these viewfinders, which is why the new models achieve this result.
1 Like