Just British mains doing what British mains do best…
I just got to this message… it is even worse than I thought…
I’ve probably killed him many times… and he’s desperate now.

You do know that you are just proving a point right?
11k/d … yes that is absolutely a balanced aircraft. no issue at all…
God I cant wait for Rafale C F4 equivalents to be added to all nations
Yes absolutely, all the fake nerfs are definetly not to blame
Ever since the nerf of EF and buff of Rafale (March 2025) - I’m not playing them cuz Rafale is just better.
But really, you should be trying to buff EF and not try to nerf Rafale? You want to have your plane in this dire state? Why waste energy on pointless bug reports.
No thanks, I have skill
AMRAAM/BOL report?
We don’t actually have the weight of the fuel tank. It was a guesstimate taking other fuel pods weight/fuel weight ration and extrapolating from there. And then keeping the calculation conservative in case some people start complaining
i don’t know exactly for the 1250L, i made the approximation based on the fact that the empty 1700L tank on Mirage is about 240kg pylon included.
But can it look this good… (No, only the Italian one can ;)
Anyhow… I wish I could play the Rafale more, I have it spaded and waiting but I’m not there with France’s ground top tier :/
Do you not have fun in air battles?
Only reason I kinda want to grind the Italian tree. I just worry that by the time I get to the Typhoon another variant is going to get added without that skin of course.
I used to prefer GRB, but imo the current EFT loadout is long overdue an upgrade. Nothing FnF (I don’t count tossing Paveway 4s) is horrid against the new sams.
I do enjoy BVR in ARB at the moment yeah.
I can’t really relate because I’m only at rank 6 air and I don’t play ground, but I think I understand
Damage of Brimstone is also very inconsistent with ERA eating them
So the current Rafale C F3R still has dozens of reports left to be made on its performance in many different aspects however recently some users have criticized the constant bug-reporting of the Rafale being said that it is unnecessary so long as it is the most dominant aircraft in the game for nearly a year. So there will be a poll to determine what will be the next steps. Should more bug-reports continue to be made or should we wait until more competitive aircrafts are added into the game?
- Wait until more competitive aircrafts are added into the game for other nations and resume afterwards
- Continue making more bug-reports and let developers decide to implement them
With the current highly performing Rafale, it’d be best to supply the devs with the most accurate reporting and materials, in my opinion. It’s on the devs to implement that, and they can (likely will, I think) sit on those materials and implementations until better, more competitive threats are added or improved (EF2000).
They can more or less isolate the performance variable of Rafale to have a baseline of “okay here is the strongest so we have to add something at least this good in order to fight it on a level playing field” and better plan future systems and aircraft implementation.
I’m sure some people will rather have any negative performance corrections added immediately and then Rafale left to slowly become obsolete when new stronger threats are added as “punishment for being too strong” when released.
Either option is going to lead to tears and gnashing of teeth but only one gives Gaijin ideas on what next to market with.
No matter what they do, I think the Rafale F.3R can only really be balanced after we get newer jets with late ir missiles. Because then it will go far up and they can add an earlier Rafale that won’t be broken at this br
According to a primary source found by Mulatu, the Rafale B (twin-seater) should weigh 360kg more than the Rafale C. Since it is a twin-seater, you can add another 80kg (pilot) for an aircraft that will effectively be 440kg more than the current Rafale C. Rafale B’s flight performance should be around the performance of the previous Rafale C before the weight reduction.


