"Dance of Dragons" Update Teaser

You are aware that the Su-24 in the trailer had GPS guided bombs(KAB-500S-E) in one of the scenes (where they mention Glass Breaker) , yes? Equivalents (e.g. JDAM, SDB-I, E-GBU, etc.) probably aren’t that far away.

Operational range: 40 km

That is nowhere near the 70km+ ranges you were yapping about in your post.

me when i see Su-24
image

me when i see Su-24 is actually Russian and not Soviet
image

fr tho I get the soviet one is kinda worse but it would be much more comparable to the (current) F-111A. I personally would just rather an Su-24 or Su-24M because they’re cooler to me and I like the cold war

2 Likes

Also TPS Hydra, historical weapons =/= nerfed

No, limiting a vehicles weapons selection is by definition nerfing, you’re limiting the effectiveness of a vehicle BY DEFINITION - don’t try to be smart with me.

image

A historical loadout of the Typhoon wouldn’t be AIM-120Bs and AIM-9s, you’re mistaking that for a incredibly early Typhoon and I’m referring to a British Typhoon as I was talking to Morvran who is publicly known to be British like me.

A historical weapon would be the ASRAAM and Meteors

And since you resorted to insults, thanks for admitting to posting incorrect information

Whatever I’ve posted physically cannot be incorrect, me saying the addition of a Typhoon without its present day weapons selection is nerfing is entirely correct - continue to cope in every thread you enter.

A “fully kitted” Typhoon means all of its AAM pylons filled, which is still just AIM-120Bs and AIM-9Li/Ms

Yep, I can totally see the AIM-120Bs and AIM-9s which Britain still uses on their FGR.4s!

1 Like

I mean, not really? At least, not in a historical sense. As long as both vehicles are from a similar time period, and carried appropriate armaments for that time period, neither would be considered ‘nerfed’. By your definition, pretty much every ARH slinger in WT, and every CAS aircraft in WT, is ‘nerfed’ because they don’t carry the gucciest shit they hypothetically could have carried before being decommissioned.

Gaijin should start putting years next to vehicle names to avoid confusion as to the appropriate time period for which to consider the vehicle’s strengths.

I mean, not really? At least, not in a historical sense. As long as both vehicles are from a similar time period, and carried appropriate armaments for that time period, neither would be considered ‘nerfed’

I’m mainly talking about a 2024 operated Typhoon, a modern fully capable Typhoon with ASRAAMs for the side of Britain and Meteors which are almost entirely chosen over AIM-120s.

A early Typhoon may have a place in the game right now but a later Typhoon in-game is not negotiable.

Gaijin should start putting years next to vehicle names to avoid confusion

Early and late is somewhat good enough, we are yet to get a rename of the AIM-9Ps to P-3 standard.

Now 3 aircraft only launch JDAM

  • AV-8B+ (USMC & Italian Navy)
  • F-15C Baz (Israel)
  • F-16C Block 50 (USAF)
  • F-16AM Block 15 MLU (Belgium)

New aircraft armed JDAM in the future

  • A-10C
  • F-15E
  • F-15I
  • F/A-18A+
  • F/A-18C/D
  • AV-8B Night Attack
  • F-2A
  • F/A-18C MLU 2

So…

Give all of the BAE vehicles to Britain.
(all CV90)

Also all Marksman turret to Britain.

And finishing move, almost all countries use British L7 so… Please dont shoot from not your gun.))))

I’m mainly talking about a 2024 operated Typhoon, a modern fully capable Typhoon with ASRAAMs for the side of Britain and Meteors which are almost entirely chosen over AIM-120s

Why would you not specify that? And why would you declare that the variant of J-10 we’re getting is inferior to the modern Typhoon as a reason to not get the Typhoon, when it’s entirely reasonable to get a Typhoon (early) right now with the addition of said J-10?

@TPS_Hydra

Thanks for proving/admitting that “nerf” means to reduce, as I stated here:

AIM-9Ms and AIM-120Bs is a historical loadout of Typhoon, that fact does not change no matter how much you claim otherwise.
This information comes directly from its service as well as the manufacturer.
So are you accusing Italy, Germany, Britain, and Eurofighter Jagdflugzeug GmbH of lying about its use of 9Ms and AIM-120Bs?

Meteor was only introduce after 2015, Typhoon has been in service since 2003.
ASRAAM has only been used by Britain, which is an operator not the manufacturer. Just as we are operators in War Thunder.

Is not all Typhoons as you incorrectly imply.
You should research Typhoons instead of being seemingly angry at me for knowing there’s at least 4 Tranches of Typhoon, and knowing their weaponry.

Britain past WWII has been a part of the American-led hegemony. They are a client state of the US. As such, I declare all Challengers should go to the American tech tree!

1 Like

The F-14A/B/D should on the JDAM list as well, since it has the LITEINING, and so has the T^3 update.

Is not all Typhoons as you incorrectly imply

I’d be saying the EF-2000 if I was referring to Germany, Italy and/or Spain. The Eurofighter is mainly referred as the Typhoon by the United Kingdom (as it was the UK which gave the name), I’m referring to a 2024 Typhoon FGR.4 used strictly by the United Kingdom.

The UK doesn’t mount the AIM-120B nor the AIM-9 on their FGR.4 fleets as they favour the ASRAAM and the Meteor.

You should research Typhoons instead of being seemingly angry at me for knowing there’s at least 4 Tranches of Typhoon, and knowing their weaponry

Irrelevant to me saying FGR.4 as that’s a UK variant, I’m aware of the funny Tranches and there being 4 and all - doesn’t change anything I’ve said whatsoever lmao.

F-14B equipped AN/AAQ-14 like F-15E & F-16C/D Block 40/42 or AN/AAQ-25 from F-14D ?

if the F15C got its AESA radar (which is withhlead for balacne) and C-5 + BOL it could put up a fight

image
no NATO country operates F15 other than USA

That is a semi-colon, sir.
Sweden wasn’t a NATO country until this year, and I guarantee that PDF is older.
F-14 has also been out of service for years.

Music from a Russian propaganda movie about the war in Syria based on real events when the Russian Su-24 was shot down? Oh gaijin, you don’t change.

1 Like

@쉐로우킨
You have no evidence the song was created by a film production company.

say what you will but its literally from the manufacturer of BOL stuff