Dance of Dragon - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

Realistically speaking max G load doesnt matter over 30G since you wont be dodging this missile anyway. The defining factor of IR missiles is their IRCCM and this factor can be easily buffed or nerfed by Gaijin for the sake of balance.

Also Python 4 will never achieve the same range as Derby because Derby is the one strapped off most air surfaces and added more aerodynamic nose cone.

1 Like

Already exists the XM914 / M230LF fires the LW30 family of cartridges (30 x 113mm) which includes a proximity round.

Its already certified as a drop in module for CROWS(-30), and assorted unmanned turrets.

The issue is that as with all EW measures they aren’t perfect nor a silver bullet, so having some form of hard-kill mechanism is a good idea since a novel threat is right around the corner.

Not denying that. Having both is the way to go Im just saying that jammers are simplier and cheaper while offering constant all around protection without the need for sensors, radars, etc.

Yeye

Funny enough its chinese again

1 Like

For what vehicle and what would it nerf?

I’m guessing we are gonna see the Brazilian valour today since the independence day is tomorrow ?

I hope we would see the Chilean one in the next two weeks
Here

Lets go part 4 coming up :P

Do we lock the topic to prevent it. Maybe it needs a cooldown ))

image

7 Likes

How about do a vote : P

But yea how are we meant to be able to scream about the Brazilian valour video lol ?

Can you make any comment at all regarding the T-90A trophy that was shown in the twitter post regarding custom tank optics today? Could we one day see it or is it some kind of internal joke and will never reach live server?

The APHE changes have me down and news of that T-90 possibly coming to the US tree one day has given me some hope lol.

There’s nothing to comment about really until we announce a vehicle. Many vehicles can often be added for testing or purposes and never come to the game. Some do, some don’t.

10 Likes

Poll on the fate of this discussion.

  • Keep it going (Part 4)
  • Close it down, no point after 40k comments
0 voters

Understood, I was doubting I would ever hear anything about it again for the last few months. Today redeemed my hope that it will come eventually.

Thank you for the clarification nonetheless.

Has there been any signs of any of these reports being actioned?

It has been a number of months at this point.

Implementing accurate limits for FIM-92 maneuverability;
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/yUohrEMuQLna

(Photo)Contrast range extension for POST seeker FIM-92 var.;
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/LbD7XSmoaAJc

Seeker Lock on Range to 6.5km;
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/CrgLh51VkpQZ

2 Likes

there was an official response to the first one

Any actions or struts changes would be updated into the reports themselves via comments.

I just saw a purge in real time

Guys, this isn’t a place to discuss issues with bug report handling or issues you personally have with staff.

As always that should be raised in PM if you have an issue.

3 Likes