No because Pakistan never used PL-9C. PL-5EII will become one of the best toptier IR missile when its seeker is fixed.
how is its seeker broken?
No IRCCM even though it had IRCCM irl.
Did they say they will fix it since it is work in progress or is it just they need more sources even though it is primary sources from AVIC website already.
Do you have a photo of dual BRM in those positions? Because the only rockets I saw in dual rack combination there were smaller 2.75in rockets, 7 rockets per pod, so two pods carry less than a single BRM pod.
Has anyone Bug reported the JF-17 missing dual Racks for the LS-6 250?
Allowing 8 to be carried.
Since they use the same pylons as the non guided 250 bombs
Any images?
Only through dcs but the jf-17 can already dual rack the regular 250’s so it should be able to dual rack the glide 250’s as well.
I still think it can carry too little loadout to be classified as an attacker.
Nothing to do with F20, which wasn’t even a thing at the time. You can see a trace of Mig 21 left if you look at the back part
Spoiler
After all, MiG design bureau also participated in the development of the aircraft (aerodynamics / engine).
https://ruslet.webnode.cz/technika/cinska-technika/letecka-technika/stihaci-letouny/fc-1-jf-17-thunder-/
It was based off Mig21 and then re-upgraded, although most Mig21s changed the back to fit in fuel.
From F-7M to be precise (which is based on MiG-21F-13).
I wonder… Can I change researched squadron vehicle in the middle of interval, or do I need to wait for the research window to pop up?
May the JF17 spam begin!
Who can change it at any tine you want, the progress will be saved and you can continue it after.
1 Like
Bro it’s 1500km/h max speed. It can barely go past mach 1.1 at low alt.
did this get implemented?
1 Like
lmao
Judging by the full quote, it likely means an RWR, and its just the English translation that makes it sound close to a MAWS system.