I mean they are decent at everything just not good in any except having the APS on 4M
Not much connection to SAAF or UK besides company leasing these Gripens being stationed in the UK. Aside from that its Gripen D
Remember in around 2 months we will get another major update so content will be planned for that and a month after that another update.
2 major updates in the next 3 months.
They are bad at armor and somewhat bad at survivability (centermass shot in the hull will usually result in 3 crew dead), bad gun handling, bad depression angles for a tank that is only survivable when hull down and decent in forward speed and firepower.
The only good qualities it has are APS and reverse.
I think u are forgetting that having armor in top tier isnt common and there are only few countries that can actually benefit from their MBT’s armor
I hope they have a good amount of top tier ground toys planned for those updates. I’m just hesitant because of how air focused the 4 most recent (including this upcoming one) updates have been.
If it weren’t for artificial nerfs, way more countries would have way more useful armor. That is, precisely, what needs to change.
3 Likes
Armor is bad but they survive a lot of hit for me.
Straight up false. Idk on what world 23,8 deg/s is bad. Obviously its not 28,8 deg/s of Leopard 2 or M1 but you cant call that bad.
I mean yeah Merkavas aswell as other minor nation tanks suffer from ahistorical armor values but calling these MBTs bad only because they arent Leopard 2A7V is just wrong…
I didn’t say they are bad; I said they are significantly worse than they should be, which, in turn, makes them indeed significantly worse that other tanks that have been modelled more correctly.
I just ask for these nerfs and issues to be addressed and fixed so that there can be some resemblance of balance at Top Tier…
They are in their respawn menu after 1-2 shots every time I meet one.
It’s vertical targeting speed can be max 15 deg/s, which is pretty bad compared to the 25-40 deg/s of the B3/BVM/90M/Leopards/Abrams/Leclerc.
I did not mean you specifically but as you said they should be modelled more correctly instead of being neglected all this time. Especially since these fixes and bug reports are well documented already and dont require any advanced work to be done.
1 Like
can you pay some attention on this?
F-111C missing AGM-142E and two extra aim9l // Gaijin.net // Issues
1 Like
Additionally they should be aim9M not aim9L. RAAF never used L
1 Like
“Balans”
@Smin1080p_WT can this PLEASE get changed?
literally cant take a 2 base loadout because the stupid system thinks its on the left wing, when its actually in the middle… same for the right side
as you can see its clearly within the max limit…
3 Likes
oooof that’s harsh
i recommend making a bug report
i cant… literally
this stupid thing is not letting me
apparently adding [dev] makes it appear, removing it then adding it after filling the issue fixed it