4 Likes
I saw the name but haven’t had a chance to look into it, thanks! I love things that look like fishing boats with guns stuck to them!
Definitely, that too!
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/HgxI7cJleCiR
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/mmL5kG7bjrdW
sorry smin it was my first time doing bug reports i made 2 bug reports now like you say and it should be good now @Smin1080p_WT
3 Likes
I don’t understand why it is also F-16 Block40. Why is it only given to the D-type Derby and Gbu15V2B, while the C-type is missing these two things?
If Gaijin wants to distinguish between their combat capabilities, can they change the F-16D to an attack aircraft instead of 16C and 16D fighters competing for rebirth points?
sadly that happens, btw have you seen what happend between the 2 cv9035’s (was checking how simular they were erlyer and found simething stupid)
Ground is not my fortee. I tried but I gave up with it. Britain is in a rather poor state at the moment
oof, so they are more or less the same tho i found one diffrence that i havent understood the other cv’s had gotten yet, the ir lock to aircrafts
Compared with DK, NL has better fire control (air-to-air locking ability), laser alarm system and additional armour.
1 Like
yeah its kinda stupid i know, the F-16C Barak II Block 40 is a joke right now its literally fictional.
booth seams to be the same variant tho i cant find eny spesific things about them, i am not sure what sight it has tho
All information can be found in the
It has the info for the base CV9035NL as well!
The Dutch CV9035NL is different from the Danish one, but only in ammunition choices, sights(french ones), light armour differences and a different LWR as the most noticeable.
No it’s well under powered by about 1300kgf. Wrong missiles and bombs missing. The electronic counter measure pod is also missing on this version. Not sure what the standard is on ECM, one Russian has it iirc.
so i think i found the reason, i belive the dutch one may be one with the MLU uppgrade tho it dosent show that well
It’s not, haha
The MLU (left) Vs the base model:
2 Likes
intresting, i am not sure tho if all of the current variants use the UTAAS sight or not but i belive the Danish, Finish and Dutch use them on all variants
yeah thought it wasnt tho that dint give me alot of explenation tho
They are working on a bug report, but most that try use very unreliable sources atm
The picture gives a clear visual difference. There are so many that it’s not needed to count them all right now.
thats sad then, myself i dont have alot of sources on the cv’s as BAE Systems dont say alot about the diffrent export variants
That was the one diffrence i always saw so i did have dubt
The Dutch government is far more accessible(also in English) if you want sources for the CV9035 that are reliable according to gaijin, I presume they weren’t able to do that with the Danish ones…
If Gaijin’s not sure of a capability, they tend to not include it. (And they disregard a lot of sale published documents from the manufacturer, as these they find unreliable)
i do have contact with some danes tho sadly none have eny conections to eny one that could help with that
Well now i am just confused, i checked the Danish also has the Saab UTAAS sight as a source
Just to make sure. Has anyone noticed this yet?
