Well we did get a reply regarding the 18C.
1 Like
The announcement says testing goes until the 29th of August tho
Because it got discussed to death, but a non controversial superhinf will get nothing
2 Likes
Im just gonna wait for someone to mention swedish armor trials and have them blame sweden for the abrams in game armor
1 Like
to low BR, but bonus testing period has ended so.
When: From August 22nd until August 29th (12:00 GMT).
3 Likes
Yet the 12.3 sea harrier did count for the bonus.
1 Like
I love how the 1990s armor trials involving two pre-production prototypes (Leclerc prototype, Leopard TVM (2A5 prototype)) and a downgraded export package of an early iteration of a baseline model (export M1A2) are taken like some kind of Armor Bible for 2010s-2020s tanks lmao
8 Likes
Clearly the swedish are to blame for it so blame them and not gaijin for their poor implementation
1 Like
Welcome to round three of the infighting about an update we know nothing about other than a leaklist that was right a couple times
Well i’m stupid, lol…
for some reason my brain went:
1 Like
Smins, here quick i gotta mention KV-1B
- A vehicle where the maximum Battle Rating of the vehicle among all modes is no more than 2 steps lower than the maximum Battle Rating of the vehicle in this research tree (in the tree type in a nation).
9 Likes
its 13.0 in arcade
2 Likes
Not mentioning how 2a7v somehow received worse armor then the tvm that was tested in sweden
Im still more curious as to how they could justify it having more armor and less weight
Sweden being favourites
I think the problem came from 2A7V having a completely new model so damage model and armor consistency werent transferred from Leopard 2A6 or Strv 122.
And worse than the 122s.
I am still waiting for a single source stating that the 122s use a newly developed package exclusive to Sweden that somehow outperforms armor 20 years more advanced.
2 Likes
Wonder why their air tree doesnt get that bias
People will still ignore this and take it face value of muh gripen
2 Likes