Ground is not my fortee. I tried but I gave up with it. Britain is in a rather poor state at the moment
oof, so they are more or less the same tho i found one diffrence that i havent understood the other cv’s had gotten yet, the ir lock to aircrafts
Compared with DK, NL has better fire control (air-to-air locking ability), laser alarm system and additional armour.
1 Like
yeah its kinda stupid i know, the F-16C Barak II Block 40 is a joke right now its literally fictional.
booth seams to be the same variant tho i cant find eny spesific things about them, i am not sure what sight it has tho
All information can be found in the
It has the info for the base CV9035NL as well!
The Dutch CV9035NL is different from the Danish one, but only in ammunition choices, sights(french ones), light armour differences and a different LWR as the most noticeable.
No it’s well under powered by about 1300kgf. Wrong missiles and bombs missing. The electronic counter measure pod is also missing on this version. Not sure what the standard is on ECM, one Russian has it iirc.
so i think i found the reason, i belive the dutch one may be one with the MLU uppgrade tho it dosent show that well
It’s not, haha
The MLU (left) Vs the base model:
2 Likes
intresting, i am not sure tho if all of the current variants use the UTAAS sight or not but i belive the Danish, Finish and Dutch use them on all variants
yeah thought it wasnt tho that dint give me alot of explenation tho
They are working on a bug report, but most that try use very unreliable sources atm
The picture gives a clear visual difference. There are so many that it’s not needed to count them all right now.
thats sad then, myself i dont have alot of sources on the cv’s as BAE Systems dont say alot about the diffrent export variants
That was the one diffrence i always saw so i did have dubt
The Dutch government is far more accessible(also in English) if you want sources for the CV9035 that are reliable according to gaijin, I presume they weren’t able to do that with the Danish ones…
If Gaijin’s not sure of a capability, they tend to not include it. (And they disregard a lot of sale published documents from the manufacturer, as these they find unreliable)
i do have contact with some danes tho sadly none have eny conections to eny one that could help with that
Well now i am just confused, i checked the Danish also has the Saab UTAAS sight as a source
Just to make sure. Has anyone noticed this yet?
They forgot to place it in rank 8? Nvm, the KF41 is also rank 7.
What?Also got MUSS fixed? Its not jamming anything.
Looking back through the replies, yes, the new PUMA’s presence has been noticed. My bad.
Info like that is usually classified or not publicly available knowledge. Assumptions just need to be made for that kind of thing, and the KF41 and Namer RCWS-30 got poor treatment for that with only 4 spikes each…
I just realizes in dev server PUMA S1 missing MUSS 2.0 and Dedronee RF-300 C-UAS.
MUSS 2.0
Dedrone RF-300 (small antenna used to located small UAV up to 9 target)
This is why I prefer gaijin add MELLS on old PUMA as modification because I knew Gaijin will ruined new PUMA with half hearted development. Even with wrong APS and Censor.
5 Likes