Dance of Dragon - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

Game Discussion General Discussion
20

They will use the +35% value given for the first 1990s DU hull package developed (and which SEPv2 most likely has already) just because it’s the only official source stating any values, not accounting that the one implemented in 2015 may, indeed, be even better…

The same way they used Leopard TVM’s values from the 1990s to model 2A7V’s 2021’s armor under the same premise of “it’s the only numbers we have”.

3 Likes
21

@Smin1080p_WT Why F14B doesn’t get the new nation bonus?

22

Well we did get a reply regarding the 18C.

1 Like
23

The announcement says testing goes until the 29th of August tho

24

Because it got discussed to death, but a non controversial superhinf will get nothing

2 Likes
25

Im just gonna wait for someone to mention swedish armor trials and have them blame sweden for the abrams in game armor

1 Like
26

to low BR, but bonus testing period has ended so.

27

When: From August 22nd until August 29th (12:00 GMT).

3 Likes
28

Yet the 12.3 sea harrier did count for the bonus.

1 Like
29

I love how the 1990s armor trials involving two pre-production prototypes (Leclerc prototype, Leopard TVM (2A5 prototype)) and a downgraded export package of an early iteration of a baseline model (export M1A2) are taken like some kind of Armor Bible for 2010s-2020s tanks lmao

8 Likes
30

Clearly the swedish are to blame for it so blame them and not gaijin for their poor implementation

1 Like
31

Welcome to round three of the infighting about an update we know nothing about other than a leaklist that was right a couple times

32

Well i’m stupid, lol…
for some reason my brain went:
identity_6_is_9

1 Like
33

Smins, here quick i gotta mention KV-1B

34

What counts as a “Top” vehicle?

  1. A vehicle where the maximum Battle Rating of the vehicle among all modes is no more than 2 steps lower than the maximum Battle Rating of the vehicle in this research tree (in the tree type in a nation).
9 Likes
35

its 13.0 in arcade

2 Likes
36

Not mentioning how 2a7v somehow received worse armor then the tvm that was tested in sweden

37

Im still more curious as to how they could justify it having more armor and less weight

38

Sweden being favourites

39

I think the problem came from 2A7V having a completely new model so damage model and armor consistency werent transferred from Leopard 2A6 or Strv 122.