If it was 9.7 id say maybe with spikes its too low but considering how it fails to come close to even most 10.0 IFV’s im slowly thinking it could be 9.7
That’s the conclusion I’ve come to. Spikes really don’t carry a 9030 far enough to be 10+
Ahem, a slower 9030, 37t with 1000hp vs 27.5t 625hp
So place it at 9.3 its a slower 9030 lmao
1 Like
Honestly, unless spikes have been fixed, that wouldn’t be an entirely bad spot.
That’s for the trackfire system, not the main gun of the cv90. It’s for integrating a remote turret with the existing UTAAS video tracking system.
Trackfire RWS is included in the Fire Control product portfolio, together with the Combat Vehicle 90 gunners sight Universal Tank and Anti-Aircraft System (UTAAS) and Pintle Mount products. The portfolio share common technology and sub-systems such as the fire control computer, video tracking module, recoil buffer and stabilisation technology.
So forgive me if I’m being a bit silly, but couldn’t they have given us a 50mm instead of 35mm?
1 Like
They could but they chose the 30mm
Yay, intentionally giving us the one that has no place in the tree.
It technically does it just meeds some fixing and potentially a BR drop
*Yay, intentionally giving us the one that has no place in the tree with its current state
Fixed. It’d be nice if we got an upgrade for the 50mm.
It would but thats not gonna happen
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Jm9QEHC2VfIO
Bruh, closed for combat weight? Well looks like the armor post is still up, wonder if they are still deciding whether to close it and give us false hope or they might actually listen
I’ve come to the conclusion their aim is to use any chance to make the cv90s sluggish, tbch. Others pretty much demonstrated they don’t think cv90s have any agility.
1 Like
The pdf is yes, but the last image you uploaded talks about the UTAAS and the VTM.
Yes, but it also shows that the VTM is a separate module that the UTAAS needs to be able to track targets. All the pints in the last image you uploaded should read as in relation to UTAAS as that is the title of the slide.
Key word here, sub-systems, so its not inherently integrated but can be chosen if costumer wants it.
What does these things have to do with the CV90 MK.IV?
YO!!
(https://youtu.be/I1TBM2bUC4E?si=v5Z5tn7CZ9XI9Q8m&t=19)
Huge! confirmed Stanag 4569 level 6!
Added to the armor report as well.
Same video confirms 35 tonnes: (https://youtu.be/I1TBM2bUC4E?si=YVVoNXrgARqUxG9G&t=14)
I did some calculations on the Weight.
Ammo:
The heaviest ammo is the airburst (which the MK.IV currently doesn’t have in dev), second heaviest is the multi purpose tracer so lets calculate based on that. 0.835kg per round, 300 rounds (is that correct?), total 250kg, add linkages and ammo boxes perhaps like 300kg?
3 crew, 80kg person with 20kg clothing and gear, total 300kg
525L fuel diesel is 0.85kg/L ~445kg total
vehicle weight (with 35mm canon, 30mm canon should be a tiny bit lighter) 35tonnes.
total: 35 000 + 300 + 300 + 445 = 36 045kg (rounded to 36 tonnes or if you error on the side of heavier 36.1 tonnes combat weight).
will see if i can make a report later in the evening.
Wrong turret version though. look at the Commander sight, APS and gun to see what turret version it is and compare to the in-game version (not a definitive way but a good indicator).
Anything to do with sights, fcs, programmable ammo etc is in the turret.
But it is a really nice video in general ^^
CV9040 BILL didn’t lower BR by its useless missile launcher, what do you guys expected?
It’s really pain to use 30mm bushmaster with another useless missile at even higher BR.
I didn’t notice the changes about BILL launcher, after I researched it, I felt very bad about it.
30mm gun works well at BR 9.3 or 9.7, if it’s in uptier game like 10.3 or 10.7 it’s really pain to use, especially fight against MBT with ERA skirt.
The more bug reports the better. Will try and make one for tracking and one for ABM tomorrow or on Sunday if noone beats me to it.
1 Like