CV 90 MK.IV data and discussion

It truly does blur my mind that the moderators disregarding the 3 different reports providing ample evidence that the CV9040 MK iv’s combat with is not the 38 tons, but that is spare weight the vehicle can handle for additional modifications and order-specific upgrades would a nation want more equipment on the vehicle.

So if we had gotten the 50mm D-turreted variant with heavier equipment, or the crewless turret the hungarians ?? want. that such a modification might use up the spare 3 tons the more ‘‘base’’ variant has available to it.

I simply do not understand how these mods can fathom, seeing all the possible modificiations that is available to the Mk iv platform all weighing in at exactly the same.

And so in short. Mods, Do better.
And thank you all who contributed to the bug reports.

2 Likes

not to mention we got the lightest version of the MKIV so the two extra tons simply doesn’t make sense

I think its their system in place for moderating and decision making that is faulty alongside the “will” to change, in accordance with the evidence provided in many cases. The huge amount of information portrayed and delivered by customers/players regarding for instance the CV90 in general but shut down by admins/Gaijin is mind boggling. Much of what has been provided and are publicly available are enough for any academic standard and should in all means thereby be enough for e.g., implementation or atleast consideration by the gaijin team.

What i want more tho is answers from admins/gaijin when something isnt correctly added, just write a motivation so that the playerbase know “why”.

2 Likes

True, a decent reason as to why the rejection is there is a good start.

Especially when their reasons are faulty, as in the case with the armor weight. because as we all see and with a modicum of sense extrapolate from the easily available information, it is just untrue.

And while i understand the mods have to through tons upon tons of posts, some more well put together than others, that is their function here on the forums, to assess the material worth we bring them, and for them to dismiss such with blatant falsehoods does everybody a disservice.

Both the dedicated playerbase that spends hours upon hours of their own free time tracking down this information, however widely available or niche the sources can be, to gaijins employees themselves as many of us loose trust in Gaijin as a company and their mods/devs that outwardly seem to do a honestly lazy job.
With just a few lines of text this image can change, and make us all much happier.

2 Likes

If any one has any bug reports id list them here. Rn the only open bug report is the armor and so far no mods have messaged me back on it or even looked at the post as it is still just open.

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/XgUBuQ1l65kD

Any and all other bug reports i will add to this list so that we can have them all listed in one spot.

Good luck getting UTAAS approved, documents from BAE Hägglunds have been used to nerf the CV90120’s engine capabilities but the same sources have been denied for UTAAS implementation due to it being an optical tracker.

It still infuriates me that the 2s38 is just better in every way despite it being implemented before it was even confirmed for service. Not to mention the tracking that actually works on it. All while being at the same BR it was implemented.

UTAAS SHOULD be on the 9040C in game but its not despite the LVKV 9040c having it modeled as a normal tracker.

I highly doubt they will even give it tracking despite the literal video evidence but we can dream.

Its not even that.
TLDR: It’s a trig-laser vector prediction.

a bit longer explanation:

It is.

Not how it works, what has been proven is that the LVKV has this VTM module added:

So for the UTAAS to be able to IR- track it has to have that VTM installed as well. otherwise its basically just lead prediction in combination with following a set direction and hoping it’s correct enough and that the target doesn’t change direction.

I don’t believe so, there is no tracking on the base STRF 9040C in game, only the LVKV 9040C

Didn’t you read the rest of my post?
UTAAS doesn’t have inherent tracking. without the VTM module its just a normal sight.

For gaijin to consider it to have automatic tracking it needs the VTM, however the sight/fcs does have some automatic tracking capability using the laser range finder, irl but you need to keep updating it with new targeting information periodically to maintain accuracy with the P3 ammunition. This functionality is obviously not in game.

As i have stated before ^^ :

Yeh i simplified it so even a novice could understand why.

1 Like

New Bug report up, please upvote

CV90 Mk.IV - Missing ABM // Gaijin.net // Issues

Will make another one for the sight tomorrow including radar and IRST. Any changes you would like to my report please feel free to write so.

It might be flagged for duplication because all the bushmaster 2 auto cannons are missing their airburst rounds regardless of IRST, Cv9030FIN air burst option not available - DEV - Actioned Bug Reports - War Thunder - Official Forum
Community Bug Reporting System 11

Possibly but those are old posts so i figure its important to highlight it once again, specially now that the vehicle is so modern.

1 Like

New Bug report:

CV90 Mk.IV - Search and Track function // Gaijin.net // Issues

This one was difficult but if anyone has more information to add please do so. The videos are the strongest information i believe. Ashame there are no better documentation in word writing or manuals, mainly due to confidentiality.

2 Likes

so now we have the following three main bugs:

Armor on the CV90 MKIV is incorrect // Gaijin.net // Issues

CV90 Mk.IV - Missing ABM // Gaijin.net // Issues

CV90 Mk.IV - Search and Track function // Gaijin.net // Issues

4 Likes

Feel free too either link that report or take information from it for the report, just make sure to mention the other vehicles it’s missing from

If you know any of the tech mods id message them these and see if they could pass them for review. Waiting for them to botice these is essentially impossible with how few players we have with swedish bug reports

1 Like

it seems we have to play bushmaster 2 on 10.7/11.7 rn,
why i have to play another cv9030 in such high tier? and another 400 k exp and 2m SL?
the question is, is the spike-lr missile worth br 1.5/2.5?
even the mkiv with 35mm gun, trade the missiles by 1 or 2 br is not worth at all.
freccia, puma and kf41 has more function and feature to be ‘‘worth’’ at 10.7.