A video going over a brief Anti tank strategy we don’t see in game
The CV90 MK4 is missing this feature in the game that would aid in fighting tanks covered in APS.
Imagine shooting a few airburst rounds that destroy the enemy tanks FCS, APS, Thermal sights.
But i imagine if Gaijin added shrapnel shells they would be insufficient to even destroy the APS effectively due to how little damage 30mm rounds do these days. Tested with the 30mm AHEAD round on the puma and it barely scratches the APS
I don’t think ahead rounds are a balancing issue for the 30mm, I think they are just a tad lazy or just haven’t gotten around to it because they are wasting time on infantry
I’m not saying that they aren’t available due to already taken balance decisions. I’m just saying that it isn’t the same as a bug that will be fixed at some point but rather something that might not get implemented at all if the developers so choose.
Based on this image is the 50x330 a trailing telescopic round?
I see the little cut out at the rear of the dart which could suggest it being a trailing design but i cant find anything concrete for it and trailing designs in general seem to be difficult to find so i only know of a few experimental designs that i dont think ever was built
Can you please forward this sentiment to whoever is running the bug reporting forum? A lot of people there are still under the impression that the decision to keep the airburst munitions and associated irst/target tracking form the cv90 is a historical issue rather than a balance choice.
Idk who decided to physically model an irst system on two vehicles (freccia and cv90mk4) but only give one the desired features but it is clearly a separate discussion from the historical one…
Ammunition additions are a balance decision provided that you have proven that the ammunition in question can be used by the vehicle. So it’s both, you have to prove with historical evidence that it can use the munition and then after that it’s a balance decision.
Regarding the air tracking it is a historical thing as well as the specific tracking used by the CV90’s not being optical tracking but instead laser range finder and trigonometry calculations for a turret aim “cruise control” so to speak.
We haven’t been able to prove air tracking for the CV90 Mk.IV so that is currently still a historical issue. I don’t know what you are referring to with the freccia but having the external sensors doesn’t automatically mean that a vehicle is able to do optical tracking. The UTAAS sight has a separate optional tracking module that is installed internally and needed for the optical tracking.
