Shocker, dw there’s always next year XD
1 Like
Thats if they bother to fix it next yeat lmao. More likely they’ll leave it to rot
3 Likes
Gotta love a 9.7 IFV with afew spikes (which miss or mildly damage in most cases) at 10.7… XD no air burst, no optical tracking no real additional protection…no thanks
1 Like
A 8.7 (how the 9030 is 9m3 is beyond me) ifv at 10.7 with no AA, no spall liners, no mobility, no armor, no fire power. Vs the puma and lynx which somehow became not the worst ifvs at 10.7 by a huge margine
2 Likes
My guess is that they will start looking at them next week, but sure enough i dont believe they will change anything before christmas, which is a shame and unfortunate, but we must keep our hopes up and wait for there response.
1 Like
Hey, @Piciu713 , would you mind taking a look at our bug reports for this vehicle for next week? They are important features.
Armor on the CV90 MKIV is incorrect // Gaijin.net // Issues
CV90 Mk.IV - Missing ABM // Gaijin.net // Issues
CV90 Mk.IV - Search and Track function // Gaijin.net // Issues
2 Likes
Doubt they’ll change anything gaijin and buffing CV90’s or implementing them correctly is very unlikely
1 Like
the new patch lived today.
the bill missile launcher pissed me off and i felt I was cheated. 9040 with a useless missile launcher increased +0.6 br. It’s fine, I use it with 90105 lineup.
now, 9030fin adds a new missiles system, increased 1.4 br. only the 9m133 worth that 1 br.
I don’t know what to say.
Magic
they changed the mk258 position, moved from the stage 4th to 3rd.
no aps, no air tracker, no liner. it’s just the cv9030 fin with 2 missiles.
bruh.
I’d rather keep playing cv9030 instead of suffered on br 10.7
and it has even worse armor than cv9040c/cv9030fin.
there is only 20+20 mm on turret and the extra 20mm only covered half of turret
the turret armor of 9030fin is 20mm steel + 50 mm composite screen, it can take 23mm ap-t at least.
there is no composite screen on UFP of mkiv, only 20mm.
The 9040 c could take the 25/30mm apds/apfsds at the front.
the 90 mkiv could only take 20mm hvap, even the 23mm ap-t would pen it.
no reason to play this one.
armor level: cv9040c >> cv9035 nl >> cv9030 fin > cv9035 dk >= cv90 mkiv > 9040 b/bill
lvkv9040c has more crews, is the king of cv90 series.
5 Likes
Doa then
guys we knew they werent going to fix anything before launch of new patch, focus on bug reports to try and get things fixed in the near future.
1 Like
No reason to just complain without it being constructive. I agree with a lot of your concerns but just complaining without trying to help with bug-reporting or source gathering wont really help anyone.
Even an argument for lowering the BR would need to be constructive, have comparative points, well structured arguments and not only a “it sucks” kind of sentiment.
This is the constructive part in regards to sources
@R_T_65837’s comment is more concerned about comparative in-game performance, it disproves the notion that maybe it was nerfed or features withheld for balance reasons.
1 Like
being constructive…
if the bug report works? most of them don’t work.
who will wait 3 or 4 patches, 1 or 2 year to fix the half made one, especially this funny game.
i just focus on this game for a while, after the new year sale, i will move to next game/hobby.
2 Likes
so what about spall liners?
5 min search gave this as a first source, would probably need more though (and i’m not sure i have the time at the moment):
(https://www.pmulcahy.com/PDFs/vehicles/tracked_apcs.pdf) p.166
I may find the time to write a bug report on this but i am not sure when. Otherwise you could pitch in, there are some documents but also pictures and video of one in Ukraine taking a tank shell i believe.
Does the Mk.IV not have a LWS?
It depends, MK.IV is mainly talked about as the hull, LWS is usually in the turret so it depends on what serries turret it has. as well as it being optional, so it also depends on if the buyer wants it.