Yeah, I am aware of it, it is currently status of a somewhat similar status to [Swiss subtree when Hunter F.58 were added, and not officially announced before.]
Very clear to see, just the official announcement hasn’t been stamped on it yet.
Also, sorry about the miscalculation of numbers about Pakistani vehicles. human error in myself.
But sadly, here we are, the majority of Chinese users on the forum protested about it, and a chain of hatred has started. :/
Anyway,
Back to the original topic
I think I really can’t understand adding Taiwanese flag as [subtree custom tree selection] option can be this problematic.
If we consider Taiwan as subtree of PRC just for arguing’s sake
-Because it is part of chinese tech tree
-and providing vehicles.
I really am unsure about rejecting that idea
because it is subtree.
Example: Thailand can be selected as flag of japan TT, and Canada can be selected as flag of both US and UK TT
I mean they nuked the fact the Hunter FGA.9 was originally added with a Rhodesian flag for the operator, which is not related to this and this is not the place to discuss the addition of it. And hiding stuff is normal for regional options look at google maps
These arguments were already addressed in my response, and I advise you re-read it, seeing you do not fully understand my words. I do not intend to, and have not, made any political statements. Rather, I am simply stating the facts of the situation, including my logic as to why it is correct to exclude the ROC flag from the custom flags functionality. Calling my comments “blatant bait” is not only false, but is also slander amounting to “bait” of your own.
