CS/SA5, another ruined vehicle, time to end this

Israel too lol

1 Like

It is important to note that the model of the FB-10A missile are incorrect, implemented in game as FB-10, an issue that is already acknowledged by gaijin, and also the missile is now using HY-6 as a place holder. I believe more would be finalized when the second dev comes online, but yes, the point that Chinese vehicle tends to be underrepresented by gaijin stood strong.

3 Likes

To be honest, if it’s really as you said, then it’s a sign of inferiority. According to the news, the French Air Show will invite China’s J-10C to participate. If this news is true, it shows that they are neither servile nor overbearing and are confident. Obviously, the latter will be more respected than the former.

They will find it difficult to make it over, cause that also requires like a 50 people delegation all the way, and to fly over half the world and get permission for it isn’t exactly easy. I doubt J10CEs will make its way alone as well, they will also likely fly over AWACS and a Y20 over, which the French may reject due to space.

i hope it becomes just a better lavad with the apfs not being 20 rounds

There are 9 bug reports which were accepted by bug managers,

Most of them, if not all, will be fixed once they’re live.

5 Likes

There’s absolutely no way it will get APFSDS. With ≈110mm of penetration at 4000 rds/m it would be way too overpowered

Not really. It’s spas after all and not like 100 mm is that much. Also they could limit it to only altars or only other rounds so u think twice.

Outside the VT-5’s lower front plate, its thickness is entirely in-line with its weight class.
It’s not a 45+ ton tank.

We’re barely past the halfway mark of the first dev server and we already have some dudes tardsmashing their computer of things clearly labelled SUBJECT TO CHANGE.

Uh huh.

Rest of this is just China cope, why even read it.

not after the continuous bug report. and many are still not accepted.

is it? It’s not just usual cope, but an example of gaijin’s lazyness

5 Likes

You literally did not read what I said above lmao
calling it cope is wild when it is justified, you sound like you have an bias as well. You are not a part of the Chinese community so you do not understand the injustice. You were not there to witness our efforts and yet you claim that what we do is somewhat unreasonable? You yourself never get frustrated with the issue report managers?

Just a few examples

3 Likes

Once again, it’s the first dev server. Are you new here?

we’ve seen many times only one dev server. and isn’t this dev server’s job? let players report bugs, but now it’s like they throw most of the work to players
and I guess you never dealt with the report mod.

5 Likes

Its just using a placeholder missile at the moment, the HN6 from the pgz04a, because the FB10A wasn’t ready yet.

visual model is complete but data of HN-6, model is old datamined FB-10 not FB-10A. it’s like R-27R and ER.
they made a mistake that can be avoided by just googling.

3 Likes

Last update was 4 dev servers. 4. The content here almost dwarfs the amount of the last update.

That’s sort of what happens when you have a hilariously small dev team.

I have.

1 Like

Why would they sell, it’s their biggest cash cow of all their games. I bet you could add up all the revenue from every other thing they publish and it’d be half of what WT brings or less.

Well that’s what it said for J11B and then it was real server and then next thing you knew, next patch already.

1 Like

Then u look at T64 and nvm even T54, and say , hey how do they get 400mm and 200mm ufp respectively and vt5 only has 50 and that is like 1/5 of the size rest is 30or 25

2 Likes