no because it would literally be unflarable
and also since gaijin is only adding aim7p to navy (despite other nations getting missiles they shouldnt have), i doubt gaijin would add 9r to f15 or 16
no because it would literally be unflarable
and also since gaijin is only adding aim7p to navy (despite other nations getting missiles they shouldnt have), i doubt gaijin would add 9r to f15 or 16
Don’t modern flares like BOL and stuff have the ability to mess up IIR seekers?
Still doesn’t actually improve kinematic performance over the -9L at all so isn’t actually that much more useful in situations where it would make a difference.
It’s effectively redundant since the few airframes that Gaijin could reasonably add it to all lie between the Battle Rating of 11.0 and 13.0, and as such do not need such efficient missiles (even if all it was was a reskinned R-73).
in that case idk still 99% sure we won’t because it’s not like russia really need an upgrade, like I sometimes fly the 27SM when I don’t feel like being a ef/raf metaslave and the R-73 is an absolutely amazing missile still
maybe i dont know, this might be getting more into ircm and ecm pods, plus again the 9r was only navy
it could be nice for the f14d or f14b
So late hornet and super hornet? They probably need it the most anyways tbh
9M-9 does have seeker increase over ingame 9M (not iir) and it’s on USAF jets so that would work pretty well
if they dont add aim9x by super hornet then that would be wild, but yeah 9r for late late hornet would make sense in my opinion
R-74M-1 is IIR, R-74M is dual band.
Its a worse magic 2.
Literally in your source
Delaminating occurs during high G turns and improvements allow it to turn more smoothly and thus in a tighter circle
This brings it back to missile flight performance. AIM-9R/M-9 will be worst of the late 4th gen missiles, so maybe 120C-5 is justified, for asymmetrical balancing
The R-74M is by no means a 9X competitor.
Its better than anything else Russia has and is considered their “equivalent.”
It’s better than the R-74M-1 and R-74M-2?
Is that even a thing in game?
one has clipped fins for the su57 and the other hasn’t entered service afaik.
It can be modeled as giving the missile a tighter turning circle
Fair enough. But even then, still lacks in flight performance against stuff like Python 4. Which is why later navy jets should get AIM-9R if P4, R-73M is added
74M1 is an export missile that uses the M2’s seeker on the 74M chassis.
R-74M2 isn’t a clipped-wing R-74, it had an improved motor and seeker.