Good morning gentlemen. I along with hundreds/thousands of other Naval players have been trying to have a discussion about the changes to Naval Arcade aiming since the moment they were made earlier this year. Naval used to be one of my favorite modes and I have spent hundreds if not over $1,000 on my Naval lineups.
A small sample of the time effort and real money that I have put into my bote lineups:
However, I pretty much never play Naval any more as I do not like Realistic battles (land sea or air), and thus my entire Naval collection is now useless to me. If the Devs are unwilling to revert the changes (even though a majority of players do NOT like the changes to Naval Arcade aiming) we/me require an option to choose which aiming method we use in Naval Arcade:
I have been leaving a message on every Naval update thread, but I have yet to receive even a simple reply from someone from the company. I would greatly appreciate this issue being taken seriously and a response posted. Thank you for your time.
IAI’s VC of External Relations spoke about annexing the North*, they do not have good relations with the North. Not to mention that Chile and Colombia were way more popular and better choices.
As much as you try, TRNC and RoC can’t really be separated here. Most TRNC citizens are RoC Citizens and therefore still interlinked. The Cypriot identity is shared with those two entities.
*and that situation is still developing and still spoken about. It is a real danger.
I don’t want to steal anything, i want to make the game more interesting. Don’t pretend like you can’t still have thoee vehicles if you play like 20 battles in whatever nation they are in.
You can have a full artillery lineup even now. Just take M44, M55 and M109 in US and that will be more than enough to last you a whole match. And if you somehow still run out, that’s what you have backups for.
Also i am pretty sure there are many more SPHs to be added to US tree, so when it’s their turn to be added, your lineup will improve even more.
If all vehicles are still in the game and available in tech trees, they can still be chosen and take away nothing from player choice. All they do is greatly improve the gameplay experience.
Wrong.
Yet i can count on fingers of my hands amount of times i ever spawned more than 3 tanks + 2 planes.
If you are good enough to get this much SP you are much less likely to die this many time. If you are likely to die this many times - you aren’t likely to get enough SP for that.
Such situations are very rare in grand scheme of things and again - you have backups for precisely such situations.
I guess if Gaijin ever cuts down on copypaste slop it will be a great time to start doing that.
I already need to replenish my stockpile, i burnt through a few hundreds of them while grinding SL
Great news here, I wonder if the chinese sam system is gonna be for top tier like HQ-9/HQ-12 or something to replace the useless antelope at 10.3 something like the HQ-7
We do not need this for naval.
Hope this is only for players who wants this.
I do not want to repair all my ship sometime. So. No, worst addition. Best way to die faster
What is the point ? Greece would add in air and ground a lot of french vehicles which are for most basically already in the game, israel literally has the kurnass 2000 which the name is about joking of the mirage 2000 name.
Israel as far as i know does not struggle in air nor in ground and could get their best spaa with or without cyprus and could also get better plane without the need of a subtree.
